Re: [MMUSIC] ICE/DTLS optimization

Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com> Mon, 04 August 2014 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <sperreault@jive.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D9C1B2B0A for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 06:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id px2dgEvOEi3d for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 06:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (mail-ob0-f175.google.com [209.85.214.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 625CA1B2B02 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 06:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id wp18so4468037obc.20 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 06:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0HRjM+O8jp62volmqk644sWxqGUczGg3mdTgI+f3vp4=; b=gg/00M2kr8HbvLA4g9MmFKUN3oe4gymWg4epQKcl5lh7pavPEI61l6ClFGyumX6Xm5 l46jq6e3IEK8gBTgwCcK2H0f8XE75f7NCrDru+x9ojDUsfSGB0gPeQNJ5yCcPjg2iCIM QfKMCqoZUpfnEwow9vS6Zy3X4gFw+lYSCt7Hpk1ADB8rdpNoITtlGWgyJwEpxE6Qlmx+ JUm7XyAh7TSBf5hMRQXG8Wuo7CnBjI5j91ahynIpzsrLmsPOP5e7Rx17AZEQ0ObWNtA4 muJKtYFU3vHywdMM2BhZjcz37ERgxQOsvTUVIX/ZuMoTeNHfQrIVOd878a7AIDmCjwkO 359A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkgnNdDT9ntY35nR/HCoAMIHMf2BGjS6zDvpk0CjDHWPVD2uZb+vPFlOySL4X+SzZBPjzEA
X-Received: by 10.60.118.8 with SMTP id ki8mr32527790oeb.29.1407160246352; Mon, 04 Aug 2014 06:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.96] (modemcable233.42-178-173.mc.videotron.ca. [173.178.42.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fu14sm75939355oeb.9.2014.08.04.06.50.44 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Aug 2014 06:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53DF8FB1.4070200@jive.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 09:50:41 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?ScOxYWtpIEJheiBDYXN0aWxsbw==?= <ibc@aliax.net>
References: <CAOJ7v-03iSNNNVMV=1vM1nUuwgCsk6JkyxPcrDEpk7MTr1LmBQ@mail.gmail.com> <53DF85B4.6060600@jive.com> <CALiegfkbxVeiUfMw2AQ=Qt=Meihq1Nxv3CDSgvN+nEc9RyCo5w@mail.gmail.com> <53DF8904.6070904@jive.com> <CALiegf=d8Sxvh73k7jpoZ2bhYv8j32th6=i6h1YVZRowSXFTwQ@mail.gmail.com> <53DF8E3F.1000402@jive.com> <CALiegfnpOpnBj-sYaJj-Aw6XjEYV9tws35aDQY+TCxtLNqsY6g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfnpOpnBj-sYaJj-Aw6XjEYV9tws35aDQY+TCxtLNqsY6g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/1wJNuBD_0Yx0MKkBmIcxwBBhAa0
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] ICE/DTLS optimization
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:50:50 -0000

Le 2014-08-04 09:49, Iñaki Baz Castillo a écrit :
> 2014-08-04 15:44 GMT+02:00 Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>om>:
>> Woah! I had not realized that RFC4571 included STUN and DTLS.
>
> It does not. It just defines a mechanism for encapsulating RTP packets
> into TCP, but the same mechanism is perfectly valid for any other kind
> of packets and thus RTC 6544 makes use of it for STUN and DTLS.

Yes, that's what I meant.

Thanks,
Simon