Re: [MMUSIC] WGLC for draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg

[Paul Kyzivat <[e-mail]>]

On 2/3/16 5:42 PM, Flemming Andreasen wrote:

> I'm not concerned about the IANA part. I agree that *if* we need to
> expliclty specify attribute interactions for "dcsa", then it should be
> part of the IANA registry. What I am not agreeing with at this point is
> that there is indeed a need to explicitly speficy these interactions as
> opposed to relying on a more general algorithmic approach (plus the
> offerer being responsible for generating a valid offer if he wants to
> establish a data channel).

Well, an obvious one is that the protocol(s) the attribute pertains to 
need to be defined to work over data channels.

	Thanks,
	Paul