Re: [MMUSIC] [mmusic] #13: Section 5.14
"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> Sat, 29 December 2012 22:55 UTC
Return-Path: <abegen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C026621F8810 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:55:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.351, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GyFMtzOmXrGQ for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:55:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D3E21F87E0 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:55:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1511; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1356821729; x=1358031329; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=jEXwk4AGO2iUyI4cS467lNyAY6b3pNDFI3tfWtIffIE=; b=hFj4baooXfqY+UUqyAcAJ/L/WyjnlnGOLOoktrIbY9o+xthWH1V6EH2O d0rc5Bf2CmoKSdWotG/SBOTdrNAV03r9BdRkcWfD1AP2Rl/L/0Kwkfrb4 GRxIp9jPdBCPYj1zGkIeQklILIYsaEKX7jg4a+WnK6JXZqX8uGDIsiIl8 A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFAKJ031CtJV2a/2dsb2JhbABEgmyoKZJPFnOCHgEBAQR5DAYBCBEDAQILVh0IAgQOBQgBh3gDDwELtnSLbWolgz1hA5Q3gnGKGwOFDoJ0giY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,379,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="154391676"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Dec 2012 22:55:28 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBTMtSTu032395 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:55:28 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com ([fe80::747b:83e1:9755:d453]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Sat, 29 Dec 2012 16:55:28 -0600
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: "bernard_aboba@hotmail.com" <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [mmusic] #13: Section 5.14
Thread-Index: AQHNmQOl8f4p7o+W3kOC3iEXNbfIoJgxDemA
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:55:27 +0000
Message-ID: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE9940CDE17E6@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <066.685c700e85270f9f6c394ad153378d7b@trac.tools.ietf.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010
x-originating-ip: [10.86.245.254]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <97191F8334FC6445B821B33445CCC5E0@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] [mmusic] #13: Section 5.14
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 22:55:29 -0000
Hi Bernard, Do you think this is necessary? http://www.iana.org/assignments/sdp-parameters/sdp-parameters.xml#sdp-param eters-2 lists bunch of other protos that we don't list in 5.14. The text in 8.2.2 is clear saying that: If other RTP profiles are defined in the future, their "proto" name SHOULD be specified in the same manner. For example, an RTP profile whose short name is "XYZ" would be denoted by a "proto" field of "RTP/XYZ". I don't think we need to clutter the text with more examples. -acbegen -----Original Message----- From: mmusic issue tracker <trac+mmusic@trac.tools.ietf.org> Date: Saturday, September 22, 2012 3:48 PM To: "Ali C. Begen" <abegen@cisco.com>, Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org> Subject: [mmusic] #13: Section 5.14 >#13: Section 5.14 > > In Section 5.14 the <proto> description only mentions RTP/AVP and > RTP/SAVP. RTP/AVPF and RTP/SAVPF should also be mentioned. > >-- >--------------------------------+------------------------ > Reporter: bernard_aboba@Š | Owner: abegen@Š > Type: defect | Status: new > Priority: major | Milestone: milestone1 >Component: rfc4566bis | Version: 1.0 > Severity: Active WG Document | Keywords: >--------------------------------+------------------------ > >Ticket URL: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/mmusic/trac/ticket/13> >mmusic <http://tools.ietf.org/mmusic/> >
- [MMUSIC] [mmusic] #13: Section 5.14 mmusic issue tracker
- Re: [MMUSIC] [mmusic] #13: Section 5.14 Ali C. Begen (abegen)