Re: [MMUSIC] [rtcweb] Is bundle just a port override?

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Fri, 22 March 2013 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4858F21F8FDD for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.832
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.832 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.148, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p7minxtc7hvE for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls2.std.com [192.74.137.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4734221F8E11 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (svani@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2MJSOTe016105; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:28:26 -0400
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost.theworld.com [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id r2MJSOht960277; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:28:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id r2MJSOvW960763; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:28:24 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:28:24 -0400
Message-Id: <201303221928.r2MJSOvW960763@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
To: "Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com>
In-reply-to: <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D90F695235@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> (mzanaty@cisco.com)
References: <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D90F6942C3@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <514829CE.4010004@alvestrand.no> <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D90F694591@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <51489A43.3030109@jitsi.org> <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D90F69476F@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <201303191936.r2JJakU4763611@shell01.TheWorld.com> <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D90F6951B8@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <CAOJ7v-2eH9oy8=OWVyoUki5ALWSwaB8x_dwpYUDJ-rY_VJ--kw@mail.gmail.com> <3879D71E758A7E4AA99A35DD8D41D3D90F695235@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org, mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] [rtcweb] Is bundle just a port override?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:29:06 -0000

> From: "Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)" <mzanaty@cisco.com>
> 
> BTW, has anyone actually observed failures?

My memory is that Cullen Jennings knows of a significant installed
base of SBCs that choke on SDP that contains duplicated port
references.

Dale