IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Merging ICE aggressive and regular nomination (was Re: [tram] Comment on draft-williams-peer-redirect-01: might it not converge?)

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 31 July 2014 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897D91A01E5 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:28:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id atpP4KfVVTRx for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com (mail-we0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C7EE1A01F7 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id u57so3411329wes.38 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=H6X31yvz7B1Tud9PzpK2uRHsQzp+nkFTZkMzQ2S6MbY=; b=b+Y48WV8O/KnLHNti5lFQxnnF1POTe8xu1/oYoujbNzveFafW7m0M+EPfhNnWRv/x6 rbCgHg917WFDYQK111lHZD5pBQrZ/c891Xn6841aRckqpP/z0qLEmme6xBjHw4BjAxZd w3G+9v+Zwx+DMQ0lm4n/FMXuGKqZbkcqmxX/TThOhJCelbMlxe+gPScqwft8jN08B+Cs OZGpRlHjz4s9Q0Si3AyhO4wmflxP/N/tdDLl2qWHHpZkBHVydmKqCq6tj8UAgba3TQnp oAirS45oTsJAHJyHSBRrBEWW1/80VnjHiarcKP+jvHKzdioKAX7nWrT9cDhrZY9Yl4dR Dqyw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.90.11 with SMTP id bs11mr802009wib.47.1406845696468; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.169.10 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALiegf=QASGR2+FuY7TKoJYrdvqbDxyUyKxvMQ13do5YX4GUyw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0DA61D09-6491-4DA4-8B6F-CFED70584A76@vidyo.com> <CAOJ7v-1jLK7dWDkWHKwHJ6qXicZWDNrAqOtw9R=6zAcWzkh5+g@mail.gmail.com> <53D796E5.9040009@jive.com> <2AF26344-DF5D-493C-96BC-80AD7DF35444@vidyo.com> <CAOJ7v-0HEjQQ+j0cAVc5r3Y4LxaoGF7EN2twGG6vTuMmEeragQ@mail.gmail.com> <8D2E9E91-B0B7-4081-B65B-EDAEC4D23A97@vidyo.com> <CAOJ7v-1HzGoUNXjvXph0-8WfpM6-vFJ+yDWhVw1_1grfrVD1Vw@mail.gmail.com> <B2794643-ADB5-4B66-98DC-841990C85437@vidyo.com> <CAOJ7v-2O3TwNcsKqp48PjDRu+Yu_+jEurecbO2GctD4Hsuu+NA@mail.gmail.com> <48776423-8594-4133-BD23-3EA561EC2A9D@vidyo.com> <CAOJ7v-13UZi4w7Vfr2dkghaosrwVYkTw5G2shq0JUvLPy30vTw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0s6EVa4KxQY99wB-BaDGr5EZwVunxrW4BBgVJLEuWhiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaa+sKWtGSaWvo6Vx=vhMbbhmLQKr2o9Z3Wjkm2-5TXDjHw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaaJDT0cgWhNkeKMKWUnHvRgZaEb9VXjV3+wHCx15_Z6+wg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaaLNjZr-3NmdJOAV-Ov6qQ1gZoEOF1dk4W52gEOUq4214g@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=QASGR2+FuY7TKoJYrdvqbDxyUyKxvMQ13do5YX4GUyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:28:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXvs_7fjQfCjeXMn4_RZExc8mYAQzqvq_fznc+kwGkKqA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?I=C3=B1aki_Baz_Castillo?= <ibc@aliax.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/3VA1daK8ZnAXRoSYy3Kq_bdSsY4
Cc: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>, mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Merging ICE aggressive and regular nomination (was Re: [tram] Comment on draft-williams-peer-redirect-01: might it not converge?)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 22:28:19 -0000

On 31 July 2014 15:17, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:
> Yes, RFC 5245 allows media coming on non-nominated pair. But note that
> RFC 5245 knows nothing about DTLS. I strongly expect that RFC 5245
> would not allow that in case of DTLS-SRTP given that allowing DTLS
> coming from "any" source address adds too much complexity.


I disagree.  I think that the general idea that the flow endpoints
might change is inherent in ICE.

There is obviously a point at which it is expedient for a range of
reasons to nail things down to a single pair of addresses.  That
includes cleanup and some SDP interactions, along with some fun
middlebox issues.  So we have an ICE process that completes, but ICE
doesn't actually *need* to complete.  It's primary goal is to find
some way to get the packets through.

v2.8.10 | Report a Bug | By Email