IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Deprecate a=quality in 4566bis ? [Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-15.txt]

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Fri, 29 May 2015 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA731AD0AC for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2015 14:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.635
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.635 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, J_CHICKENPOX_17=0.6, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1wRkuflYb3ZK for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2015 14:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C776A1A8931 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2015 14:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-13v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.109]) by resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id ZxBR1q0052N9P4d01xBgwL; Fri, 29 May 2015 21:11:40 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.151]) by resomta-ch2-13v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id ZxBf1q00J3Ge9ey01xBfUS; Fri, 29 May 2015 21:11:40 +0000
Message-ID: <5568D60A.20001@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 17:11:38 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>, mmusic@ietf.org
References: <20150505141341.12350.74919.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <98AC1ED5-BDC6-40AC-BA20-431558245E21@cisco.com> <554A3AC8.8020605@alum.mit.edu> <5568C686.60406@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5568C686.60406@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1432933900; bh=FToFZJLQPzUyqwYhI/BoJRbbpTrrHIuJEeKnBh2vmNQ=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=DH+iXbKfdJEqY2Y0v+XNzXzWh7XYHHVp8OjKWfkKkEA6MtYiAsAbI2RTdlL/RO4wW 1Evr5tqcOtlsPyRNXzfJ+Db1h47E/MbJFWoj2UygnUEgE16tRdb3EhN4tWbE4i7Sim yKHejCkszmjVVVIPwLfv76Jsn+fPajmT34lGN0qsETfFx4Z2j/v6J6TAPM6CB2CTUl l4V/6Mi2roMx3xo2259s3BYnsDvkjreQuYekZ041rFTWyGrU9aNAndyxQvd5iZLg3w aqLNa4us9ugt6oyNcCWfiWIO74ni51aMfs3G57sWsF7pcwi914tOlBbsZo35rc+Wb9 dhT64u1PUsU4g==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/4m0T7Mmo95IIZE4QamL3zNHra-o>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Deprecate a=quality in 4566bis ? [Re: FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-15.txt]
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 21:11:41 -0000

On 5/29/15 4:05 PM, Flemming Andreasen wrote:
>
>
> On 5/6/15 12:01 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>> On 5/5/15 10:17 AM, Ali C. Begen (abegen) wrote:
>>> This version addresses all the existing issues except:
>>>
>>> 1) a=quality is neither well defined nor known to be used. However,
>>> the chairs (I believe Ari) were supposed to confirm this with SIP
>>> Forum. A note has been added to the document.
>>
>> I posted a query to sip-implementors about this.
> Thank you Paul. Did you hear anything back ?

I had no responses indicating any use.

	Thanks,
	Paul

> In either case, does anybody else have any concerns with deprecating
> this attribute in 4566bis ?
>
> -- Flemming
>
>
>

v2.20.3 | Report a Bug | By Email