Re: [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middleboxes draft (draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes) ?

"Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)" <mperumal@cisco.com> Fri, 14 June 2013 00:55 UTC

From: "Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)" <mperumal@cisco.com>
To: "Flemming Andreasen (fandreas)" <fandreas@cisco.com>, mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middleboxes draft (draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes) ?
Thread-Index: AQHOaIPK9c8MlcQHmEqhQOA1j4RvYpk0YMvA
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:55:12 +0000
Message-ID: <E721D8C6A2E1544DB2DEBC313AF54DE22413EC9E@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com>
References: <51BA44CC.6000607@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <51BA44CC.6000607@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E721D8C6A2E1544DB2DEBC313AF54DE22413EC9Exmbrcdx02ciscoc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Ari Keranen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>, Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>, "draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middleboxes draft (draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes) ?
Precedence: list

|1) Indicate if you are in favor of continuing this work.

I don't have any opinion on this.

|2) If you are willing to actively contribute to the work by either
|a) Sign on as co-author, drive the open issues to resolution, and update the
|   document accordingly
|b) Actively contribute to discussion and resolution of open issues in the draft.

I've contributed some text to this draft and I am willing to contribute to the discussions and resolution of the open issues if the WG decides to finish this work.

Muthu

From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Flemming Andreasen (fandreas)
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 3:47 AM
To: mmusic
Cc: Ari Keranen; Hadriel Kaplan; draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middleboxes draft (draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes) ?

Greetings MMUSIC

As noted previously (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg09368.html), we currently have a milestone for " Considerations for using SDP offer/answer with middleboxes" and we have a WG draft for that in the form of

    http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes/

When we polled for interest in this work about 1 year ago (per the above thread), there was some indication of continued interest in the work, however there were also some (significant) concerns expressed with the draft itself (see e.g. most recent thread in http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg10163.html). These concerns have existed for well over a year and we have seen very little discussion or active work trying to resolve them.

In lieu of the above, the chairs would like to ask the WG participants to

1) Indicate if you are in favor of continuing this work.

2) If you are willing to actively contribute to the work by either
a) Sign on as co-author, drive the open issues to resolution, and update the document accordingly
b) Actively contribute to discussion and resolution of open issues in the draft.

Please note, that if you answer "yes" to 2a or 2b, then you should assume that you *will* get called upon to deliver on that.

Also please note, that if we do not get sufficient positive responses to both 1 and 2 above, then our plan is to remove the milestone and abandon the WG draft.

Thanks

-- Ari & Flemming (MMUSIC co-chairs)

[MMUSIC] What should we do with the middleboxes d… Flemming Andreasen
Re: [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middlebox… Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
Re: [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middlebox… Hannes Tschofenig
Re: [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middlebox… Flemming Andreasen
Re: [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middlebox… Hadriel Kaplan