Re: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC WG June 17th virtual interim agenda

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Sat, 15 June 2013 14:11 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79B4A21F9C11 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 07:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.319
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.319 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.118, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hBKLEnAr6DUT for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 07:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4868421F9C37 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 07:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.60]) by qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id odVg1l0041HzFnQ57eBBkA; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:11:11 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id oeBB1l00R3ZTu2S3aeBB1d; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:11:11 +0000
Message-ID: <51BC75FD.50504@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:11:09 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <51BB5EFE.5090903@ericsson.com> <51BC3661.6050603@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <51BC3661.6050603@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1371305471; bh=l2t4G845yTfqk76gLOen0dq7z36KIm3BC7NuY5hKrZc=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=Hrhi9Fdn04sIZZQ/Yqc+IMs+avKDePKXtvO9gKlKPI6/ykAB2JEIwwqdBTPvSdOt7 kBUemcIPGBx/G8J7GZqU2mE9tszwZCbTOHGCJbF3ee0Ah9XFBe5bsrc7D0QLRsJTAh ugKdj3Cea2Tq9etVsSuD4GfPfMiLDHIR1Jk8abzZcbIJveDU7IhhbLv57wBBqR5HWZ 5S9mZj503FGE3PMwQk0C9iirg4m2QaybYGCRMC8bjaxraeogI6FbxNZdz9OJiCCBSF xaWhHIn7GgWXibYHYWc0tDkJ1oUqihcZcRDqKuw6gV/IuKe8A6Iy4/H971UOMn8BqS QStYpS4ZBiZLA==
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC WG June 17th virtual interim agenda
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:11:18 -0000

+1

On 6/15/13 5:39 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> Not on A vs B, but on the agenda:
>
> This time allocation is:
>
> - 20 mins administrativia
> - 120 mins presentation
> - 40 mins discussion
>
> I do not think this is a wise allocation. It maximizes the time given to
> plan "owners" to present their viewpoints, and minimizes the time
> avaliable for people who do not "own a plan" to present a viewpoint.
> People who come to the meeting SHOULD have read the drafts beforehand.
> If not, listening to 60 mins of presentation won't make them understand
> the issues.
>
> I would suggest instead:
>
> - 10 min administrativia (agenda bash)
> - 15 min Plan A presentation
> - 15 min Plan A clarification questions
> - 15 min Plan B presentation
> - 15 min Plan B clarification questions
> - 10 min presentaton on "what questions do we need to answer" (by the
> chairs)
> - 90 min discussion on answering the questions (structured by the chairs)
> - 10 min administrativia (wrapup)
>
> (and yes, this is enough time that one could fit in a slot for "no plan"
> too)
>
> (I'm HOPING that the draft agenda is intended to show "presentation and
> discussion" for each draft, not what the words on the agenda currently
> say. But if not, I'm considering whether calling in 2 hours late is a
> reasonable option.)
>
>
> On 06/14/2013 08:20 PM, Ari Keränen wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Given the guidance from the RTCWEB WG chairs that the "no-plan"
>> discussion should essentially happen at the RTCWEB WG, the MMUSIC
>> interim meeting on June 17th will be focused on Plan A and Plan B. The
>> goal of the meeting is to clarify what are the two different plans,
>> what are their key differences and merits, and how can we select one
>> to move forward with.
>>
>> Here's the draft agenda:
>>
>> 7:00 – 7:10 Agenda bash & Note takers
>> 7:10 – 8:10 Plan A Presentation
>>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-roach-rtcweb-plan-a-00
>>  (also http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-roach-rtcweb-glareless-add-00)
>> 8:10 – 9:10 Plan B Presentation
>>   http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00
>> 9:10 – 9:50 Discussion on preferred approach
>> 9:50 – 10:00 Wrap-Up & Next Steps
>>
>> Note: All Times are Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)
>>
>>
>> The WebEx information for joining the meeting is available here:
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg11488.html
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ari & Flemming (MMUSIC co-chairs)
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmusic mailing list
>> mmusic@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>