IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Partial Offer/Partial Answer draft

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 15 October 2013 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6ED21E8139 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.204
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.204 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SJ3ky5Qaj7WQ for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4647321E8130 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [162.189.90.45] ([172.56.7.74]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r9F0Mr8T059147 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Oct 2013 19:22:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
References: <525C7537.4080209@nostrum.com> <CABkgnnV+VihxB1X_KdaG5fAAVfuk2s06fQKApxFHWd_wG8Wksw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnV+VihxB1X_KdaG5fAAVfuk2s06fQKApxFHWd_wG8Wksw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C5BA15C5-34BF-4ACA-B41A-B65927801346@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B350)
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 19:22:47 -0500
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 172.56.7.74 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Partial Offer/Partial Answer draft
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 00:23:23 -0000

It's certainly not unsolvable, it's just unsolved. From an information perspective, it can be done unambiguously. We just need to come up with an elegant syntax.

/a

On Oct 14, 2013, at 19:18, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 14 October 2013 15:50, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-roach-mmusic-pof-pan-00.txt
> 
> If I read this correctly, that first open issue is a real humdinger.
> It's going to be a deal-breaker if it means that I can't add new lines
> to an existing BUNGLE group.
> 
> I was tempted to suggest that you include all session-level a= lines,
> but that's going to expose you to glare on the same scale as
> unmodified 3264 O/A.  I'm going to need to noodle on this for a while,
> because until that issue is resolved, this doesn't really solve the
> problem.

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status