Re: [MMUSIC] [rtcweb] Translating Plan A into No Plan (Was: No Plan)

[Emil Ivov <[e-mail]>]

On 03.06.13, 23:06, Cullen Jennings wrote:
>
> On Jun 3, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Emil Ivov <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> An offer generated by a "No Plan" browser in this case would look something like this:
>>
>>    v=0
>>    o=- 20518 0 IN IP4 198.51.100.1
>>    s=
>>    t=0 0
>>    c=IN IP4 203.0.113.1
>>    a=ice-ufrag:F7gI
>>    a=ice-pwd:x9cml/YzichV2+XlhiMu8g
>>    a=fingerprint:sha-1 42:89:c5:c6:55:9d:39:f9:b6:eb:e7
>>    a=group:BUNDLE m0 m1
>>
>>    m=audio 56600 RTP/SAVPF 96 0
>>    a=mid:m0
>>    a=rtpmap:96 opus/48000
>>    a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
>>    a=ptime:20
>>    a=sendrecv
>>    a=rtcp-mux
>>    [ICE candidates]
>>
>>    m=video 56602 RTP/SAVPF 97 98
>>    a=mid:m1
>>    a=rtpmap:97 H264/90000
>>    a=fmtp:97 profile-level-id=4d0028;packetization-mode=1
>>    a=rtpmap:98 VP8/90000
>>    a=sendrecv
>>    a=rtcp-mux
>>    [ICE candidates]
>
> In no-plan, What would the answer look like if you were receiving 2 video stream?

It would look like the above. Additional application-specific signalling 
would also say something like this:

{
      "firstStream":
      {
          "SSRC": "11111",
          "accept": "false"
      },
      "secondStream":
      {
          "SSRC": "22222",
          "accept": "true"
      },
      "thirdStream":
      {
          "SSRC": "333333",
          "accept": "true"
      },
}

Emil

-- 
https://jitsi.org