Re: [MMUSIC] [clue] Incoming liaison statement from MPEG
Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org> Fri, 01 June 2012 17:17 UTC
Return-Path: <stewe@stewe.org>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A467C21F89AF; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.473
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.473 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.125, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mcB6m-PJusIA; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (tx2ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF9F21F89AD; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 10:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail18-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.243) by TX2EHSOBE002.bigfish.com (10.9.40.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:17:26 +0000
Received: from mail18-tx2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail18-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0374A420091; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:17:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0710HT002.namprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -18
X-BigFish: PS-18(zz9371Ic85eh14ffI168aJzz1202h1082kzz1033IL8275bh8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839he5bhf0ahbe3k)
Received-SPF: pass (mail18-tx2: domain of stewe.org designates 157.56.240.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.133; envelope-from=stewe@stewe.org; helo=BL2PRD0710HT002.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
Received: from mail18-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail18-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1338571042113842_32420; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:17:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TX2EHSMHS042.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.245]) by mail18-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC9E160054; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:17:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0710HT002.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.133) by TX2EHSMHS042.bigfish.com (10.9.99.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:17:20 +0000
Received: from BL2PRD0710MB349.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.1.39]) by BL2PRD0710HT002.namprd07.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.102.37]) with mapi id 14.16.0164.004; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 17:17:51 +0000
From: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
To: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, "clue@ietf.org" <clue@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [clue] Incoming liaison statement from MPEG
Thread-Index: AQHNQBO2HABb7jVb90Wz1DwtPvoFRZblrqog//+Qw4A=
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:17:50 +0000
Message-ID: <CBEE45B1.87915%stewe@stewe.org>
In-Reply-To: <4fc8f5b1.4166b40a.71d3.ffff876f@mx.google.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.255.102.5]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CBEE45B187915stewesteweorg_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: stewe.org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] [clue] Incoming liaison statement from MPEG
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 17:17:58 -0000
Hi Roni, The statement was sitting in my inbox for a few days, and I have forwarded it to the secretariat for posting only this morning. Therefore, it is not yet on the tracker, but should be on the tracker sometime soon. Color primaries, as one example, can actually being sent in SDP today, as part of the VUI in the sequence parameter set of H.264. And, color primaries are an interoperability point, at least for high quality applications (such as video contribution). If your receiving box does not understand, or cannot meaningfully process color primaries as sent, then you may get a picture but it will look odd… There is also other stuff in the MPEG doc that is even more needed for interoperability; for example, association of audio channels inside the codec bitstream with a speaker location. The key point of the MPEG doc is that they are out farming generic codec things from the audio/video specs into this MPEG-A format, and we (as we are not using MPEG-A) will probably have to find a way to either encapsulate MPEG-A XML for cap exchange, or translate the code points to SDP-ish things. Stephan From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com<mailto:ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>> Date: Friday, 1 June, 2012 10:00 To: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org<mailto:stewe@stewe.org>>, "mmusic@ietf.org<mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>" <mmusic@ietf.org<mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>>, "clue@ietf.org<mailto:clue@ietf.org>" <clue@ietf.org<mailto:clue@ietf.org>> Subject: RE: [clue] Incoming liaison statement from MPEG Stephan, I did not see the liaison statement yet in MMUSIC, so I hope it will be available in time for us to review. >From the example of color primaries I am not sure why we need to have this in SDP. if this is something that is sent as part of the payload do we need to send it also in SDP? Roni From: clue-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:clue-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:clue-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stephan Wenger Sent: Friday, June 01, 2012 7:29 PM To: mmusic@ietf.org<mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>; clue@ietf.org<mailto:clue@ietf.org> Subject: [clue] Incoming liaison statement from MPEG Hi all, MPEG is working towards codec independent code points, and has sent to MMUSIC a liaison statement asking for our input. Especially the audio stuff may also be relevant to CLUE, so I copy CLUE here as well. No deadline is provided, but I note that MPEG meets two weeks before the Vancouver IETF meeting and the text they sent us is already a CD, so our time to influence their decisions (if we choose to do so) is limited. MPEG has observed that many code points relevant for audio and video are generic in the sense that they can be applicable to many video or audio codecs. Recent MPEG (and joint MPEG/ITU) video coding standards have occasionally copy-pasted whole sections of code points concerning things like color primaries. They want to avoid this in the future. So they farm out stuff that is historically located in video/audio codec specs, but are likely to be common between different codecs. My hunch is that the code point in their draft standard could be translated to SDP-ish syntax. At this point, it is XML-ish. Stephan
- [MMUSIC] Incoming liaison statement from MPEG Stephan Wenger
- Re: [MMUSIC] Incoming liaison statement from MPEG Miguel A. Garcia
- [MMUSIC] Incoming liaison statement from MPEG Stephan Wenger
- Re: [MMUSIC] Incoming liaison statement from MPEG Roy Yue(PeiYu)
- [MMUSIC] Incoming liaison statement from MPEG Stephan Wenger
- Re: [MMUSIC] [clue] Incoming liaison statement fr… Roni Even
- Re: [MMUSIC] [clue] Incoming liaison statement fr… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [MMUSIC] [clue] Incoming liaison statement fr… Thomas Stockhammer
- Re: [MMUSIC] [clue] Incoming liaison statement fr… Mo Zanaty (mzanaty)
- [MMUSIC] Fwd: [clue] Incoming liaison statement f… Mary Barnes
- [MMUSIC] Incoming liaison statement from MPEG Stephan Wenger
- Re: [MMUSIC] [clue] Incoming liaison statement fr… Bert Greevenbosch