Re: [MMUSIC] Congestion control

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Mon, 10 June 2013 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78ED721F9A6D for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:17:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.544
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.544 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.054, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bF-0n+Ze+GDE for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc3-s9.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s9.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.84]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CC221F9ACC for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:16:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU169-W35 ([65.55.116.73]) by blu0-omc3-s9.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:16:38 -0700
X-TMN: [po8f/CqVek4DEizi0WJ/f1fv59eY89O3RoCgte5ikHI=]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU169-W35E035EC4AC7AE5BBCCBBC93840@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_c481e80d-3364-4083-b906-09982e657eee_"
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:16:37 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <4D8F5FFC-F89B-4A5B-8464-3EF20E7D67E9@iii.ca>
References: <20130530185619.4124.56395.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51A87F91.2080500@jitsi.org> <51AEA08D.8090103@cisco.com> <BLU403-EAS336A4AA94CDB5E97170F9A5939F0@phx.gbl>, <25B9903E-DC06-4BB0-92A1-C1E7A2AA569E@iii.ca> <BLU169-W609A2EAD331201B824EB6093980@phx.gbl>, <4D8F5FFC-F89B-4A5B-8464-3EF20E7D67E9@iii.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jun 2013 19:16:38.0526 (UTC) FILETIME=[0802B1E0:01CE660F]
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Congestion control
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:17:24 -0000

Cullen said: 

 " No O/A is request to stop sending RTP packets on a given stream. " [BA]  So you're saying that you don't expect a=sendrecv/recvonly/sendonly to be used in Plan A to control streams described by individual m lines?    I had assumed that the O/A behavior described in RFC 3264 Sections 5.1 and 6.1 would apply in Plan A.