Re: [MMUSIC] [rtcweb] Proposed Agenda for Interim

Flemming Andreasen <> Fri, 04 January 2013 02:03 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4099421F8D59; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:03:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.889
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.709, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gGzc9zQ9VNWV; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:03:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E01D21F8D74; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:03:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=5071; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1357265032; x=1358474632; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=qVSRLUGGndTkzfigXqbFS/Hh7ijRMs+pJh0mGaPkfeU=; b=FQ+C0Tpedurwmr+epotNy5DivhBeredBLO3pHTfVwVJNroMXNtX6S4hV yge6oNiGFvvcCsNP+ILTM8mJGAgKJddObtqvJpEaOSBWUZ2YLJ3yN1/Sr vGHpG92ahmeCVRi413cDKm1EOMiptf2emzrMI9BwAjECvyUisHVUy9z3X E=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.84,406,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="158711080"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 04 Jan 2013 02:03:52 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0423pPf001653; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 02:03:51 GMT
Message-ID: <>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:03:50 -0500
From: Flemming Andreasen <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bernard Aboba <>
References: <>, <BLU405-EAS355F89AD238C9FB48DFD14F93220@phx.gbl>, <> <BLU002-W7BBB1FEC4D1BEEDF1498C93220@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU002-W7BBB1FEC4D1BEEDF1498C93220@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040806000000070002020905"
Cc: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <>, "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] [rtcweb] Proposed Agenda for Interim
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:03:53 -0000

On 1/2/13 2:44 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> Cullen said:
> "3) if we are going to have an MMUSIC face to face interim meeting, it 
> would need AD approval and 4 weeks notices which puts us very close do 
> the deadline so this needs to get sort out real soon. "
> [BA] I see no particularly good reason why this can't  happen 
> quickly.  In fact, why not schedule two MMUSIC interims, 4-6 weeks 
> apart from each other?  If travel is an issue, they can be virtual.  
> EKR's issue list is a fine starting point, and there is an informal 
> IESG telechat tomorrow (3-Jan) as well as one on 10-Jan-2013.
> Ted's suggestion (to cover this in the RTCWEB interim) might do in a 
> pinch, but really, MMUSIC WG has to develop a sense of urgency on 
> this.  If things keep going as they have, by the time we get published 
> RFCs out of MMUSIC,  implementations will have been in the field for 
> years.
The MMUSIC WG is driven by the contributions, discussions, and 
ultimately rough consensus of its participants, just like any other WG. 
The active participants on the topics of interest here seem to be 
largely the same in the two groups, so I'm not sure exactly what you are 
looking for or proposing here, but constructive suggestions are always 


-- Flemming (MMUSIC co-chair)

> If MMUSIC were a Hollywood Celebrity, we'd be *way* past the time for 
> "tough love" and on the front page of the National Enquirer for the 
> Nth time.
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list