Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-38: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Mon, 12 August 2019 23:04 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA3612081A for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 16:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.887
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.887 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fcSCYRojhHFF for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 16:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76D5D12022A for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 16:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id w26so5185961pfq.12 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 16:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dMtRE1Z9PHZJSMbXD1xV88LId5jqXUnvdH/Z90Ago4Y=; b=ayEuJhOYH8O8daSydemQehnwwaaFoY0HZM5uJdlSBMJt74PsbtdpRQD1ds2LgArUzw 40D+9Mx2U2V5Mp7Tc5fonJIucCNuLwgM56rOOU7MX3N9BNY4NO868+lTSJa2Rvzm/gpK T6qYSaz44gKVfJgyHQmT+OxR2bPhCQ9uYswxjiYe3S1RWj++eyAkC0K0YPUo36YuCqPP dl0teTkwNRylMY/vZgmIV77IidMsCYQC4ejfTPun1meh6Tb3uiaGzRCwT7Rl/06/nHoF /Zu4kPqcb66GAVXXFS47C0GbPR5LmRi1F17oEHUBULpuDcFrXFuolFpOAKax/Ll3KycC hkbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dMtRE1Z9PHZJSMbXD1xV88LId5jqXUnvdH/Z90Ago4Y=; b=NHX8qVE6yXJjEWGoNkrpjjYnyeby/dEfNf9a8SXqa2YHvlZ+Dr+mibmkJ2+WWlGoTD f17VStRp+5wjii9oECt2QDClMv6bGICK8yMPeUI7WlqfG7qUzbaVChXQ7Ks3epEwPRr4 AeeXX0vAUVxueWJ9s8yxa3r+d//VejmkRWeovjvn6vSbmhpTX9aZa4bqzqbYmbmLte56 etXbFNgKE8XtglQYKn2bAJMVmxMAFsCB7D0V31W/eXYfdGzl4tYLIq6bvcjLVk4gW6tt EM/ZkMzlD7ZEb8jYNkS/wcxN7/Xc+ULLWCUtKTY+lt0cFLBERKyxsWv5l1d0wVVDGmBo f2Og==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWvOy+C62j+QzJpzWoU/hcsNAyIAZtS+lK7URQrm0z9RwaZEgSt 0RbRSjkQ//HgW6NZo698yne73A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzDAJVvt9MY7o/HZ1OtBFmN8Lwd4I8HysC3XxDCru7UF1Smw0fvI3MVFmC3bQ+wX4OLlGayUQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c68c:: with SMTP id n12mr1489261pjt.29.1565651048860; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 16:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-f174.google.com (mail-pl1-f174.google.com. [209.85.214.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p5sm5472331pfg.184.2019.08.12.16.04.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Aug 2019 16:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-f174.google.com with SMTP id t14so48424658plr.11; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 16:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a40c:: with SMTP id p12mr35119361plq.146.1565651047052; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 16:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156537593203.15838.12286824910808417510.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <48D3EDF4-EDEC-4D69-BDDC-258104A90FF3@ericsson.com> <CAMRcRGS-2p9ymeUVGdNd0NUZZf30bxXNWCOF4nr-J0EPkwACHg@mail.gmail.com> <F160B56B-8A54-4D9C-8120-E31BDE2543FC@ericsson.com> <8ad96c03-905f-ed6e-370a-868856b85045@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <8ad96c03-905f-ed6e-370a-868856b85045@nostrum.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 19:03:56 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5OKxsP=OQbBRV7dfwqh1gkjMFSDao_zuScSipNczEQAcDvng@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxsP=OQbBRV7dfwqh1gkjMFSDao_zuScSipNczEQAcDvng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Suhas Nandakumar <suhasietf@gmail.com>, "mmusic-chairs@ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp@ietf.org>, "fandreas@cisco.com" <fandreas@cisco.com>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000809511058ff38a36"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/9scKhOcsUsYOH5mpTbhYpKxqTow>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-38: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 23:04:11 -0000

Hi Adam,

One of the common use cases for ICE is to allow correct address selection
for dual network systems. Because of this, I think it make sense to add
IPv6 host candidates to examples, since this reflects common ICE use case.

What do you think?
_____________
Roman Shpount


On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 6:17 PM Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> On 8/11/19 4:28 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>
> Hi Benjamin,
>
>
>
> The following pull request addresses most of your remaining issues that
> were not addressed in version -38:
>
>
>
> https://github.com/suhasHere/ice-sip-sdp/pull/20
>
>
>
> NOTE 1: I have not yet updated any examples with IPv6 addresses. I’d like
> Adam to comment on that, since he previously said it shouldn’t be done.
>
>
> Yes; Éric raised the same point. My reply to him was: "The point of the
> examples in this document is to demonstrate the presence of a NAT. While
> they could be replaced with NPTv6 examples (or other examples of IPv6
> address translation), I think that doing so would not be in the spirit of
> the IAB statement on IPv6, even if stateless."
> /a
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>