[MMUSIC] Draft new version: BUNDLE-15

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Fri, 16 January 2015 08:26 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12B91AC3B6 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:26:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ivaCbQkM00Yr for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:26:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B33E1AC3B5 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:26:31 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79fc6d000001087-d4-54b8cb354b74
Received: from ESESSHC020.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id AE.EB.04231.53BC8B45; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:26:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.175]) by ESESSHC020.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.78]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:26:28 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Draft new version: BUNDLE-15
Thread-Index: AdAxZRMr0AxtXFNCRg6L0QJwuAWZQw==
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 08:26:27 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D63AF1D@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.16]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D63AF1DESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja7p6R0hBhNPa1n825tkMXX5YxYH Jo8lS34yeXy5/JktgCmKyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK+Pas6CC1QoVXQ1tzA2Mc2W6GDk5JARMJL5d bGOHsMUkLtxbz9bFyMUhJHCEUeLtnJlMEM4SRokTHetZuhg5ONgELCS6/2mDNIgIqEt83dvD DGIzCzhKnL21nQnEFhZQlVj89DErRI2WxMfHv9ggbD2Js01TwepZgGqO3d/PAmLzCvhKHNze wQhiMwId8f3UGiaImeISt57MZ4I4TkBiyZ7zzBC2qMTLx/9YIWxFiZ1n26FuyJd4euodG8RM QYmTM5+wTGAUnoVk1CwkZbOQlEHEdSQW7P7EBmFrSyxb+JoZxj5z4DETsvgCRvZVjKLFqcXF uelGxnqpRZnJxcX5eXp5qSWbGIGxc3DLb90djKtfOx5iFOBgVOLh/bBtR4gQa2JZcWXuIUZp DhYlcd48hw0hQgLpiSWp2ampBalF8UWlOanFhxiZODilGhjb23K8/u+R62bg7fLc1D/zbvAW wRNJv6eE8UfXMwoXXQq88CXNUVA//MiskD96S1lm31lxRmazYFS4tP6PXJv5s1zVbyislHhS kf7swYu5PmUHvgWvbDk30+VCxl5O5nvdmx7krI9aFOmvbaC33kxit2fnhH7uN7NnR0qqF195 u8VKQEaSmVWJpTgj0VCLuag4EQBRPWvafgIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/A-Po_sU7h1XkTjRtSGxoK18mOL0>
Cc: "mmusic-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [MMUSIC] Draft new version: BUNDLE-15
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 08:26:34 -0000

Hi,

I've submitted a new version (-15) of BUNDLE.

There is only a minor editorial change in section 8.5.2, based on feedback from Paul (19th December).

There are currently to open issue identified in the draft.

However, we still need to close Thomas Stach's comment on relaxing the BAS offer. The draft currently says "SHOULD send a BAS offer", but my understanding is that Thomas wants to make it completely optional. Correct?

Note that this does NOT affect statement saying that, once a BUNDLE address has been negotiated, it MUST be included in any subsequent offers. The question is about mandating a second offer as soon as the BUNDLE address has been negotiated.

Regards,

Christer