Re: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC Draft Agenda for IETF 87

Just to also note that we haven't directly yet opened up a discussion with the MMUSIC chairs on this, AVTEXT chairs were busy working out what they wanted to cover last night before we hit the agenda deadline.

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> Sent: 18 July 2013 13:46
> To: Harald Alvestrand; mmusic@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC Draft Agenda for IETF 87
> 
> Ideally, AVTEXT (as in the AVTEXT chairs) would have liked the MMUSIC
> discussion first, but I suspect they are dealing with a whole lot of other
> scheduling problems.
> 
> I'd also note that the AVTEXT agenda point relates to one very small part
> of this discussion.
> 
> There have been a number of mentions of the need for RTP header extensions,
> which are therefore within the scope of AVTEXT. Timescales are getting
> shorter and shorter for this to happen, so we want to open up some
> information exchange about:
> 
> 1)	Is this a sensible usage of a RTP header extension;
> 2)	What we need to do (and that is "we" as in IETF as a whole) to make
> this happen.
> 
> I may be wrong, and if need be we'll have one slide per solution, but I
> suspect all the discussions that identify a need for an RTP header
> extension are trying to address a similar problem. It may be that we can
> corner the various authors into a hallway discussion on Monday and get
> them to come up with a single idea of what is needed.
> 
> That means we don't necessarily need the MMUSIC discussion to happen first,
> even if it makes any AVTEXT discussion results conditional on MMUSIC
> making some form of agreement.
> 
> The AVTEXT chairs would welcome any input to this.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Keith
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> > Of Harald Alvestrand
> > Sent: 18 July 2013 13:26
> > To: mmusic@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC Draft Agenda for IETF 87
> >
> > On 07/17/2013 11:49 PM, Flemming Andreasen wrote:
> >
> >
> > 	The MMUSIC draft agenda for IETF 87 has been posted at:
> >
> > 	https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/87/agenda/mmusic/
> >
> > 	Please take a look and let us know if you have any questions or
> > comments.
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I note that AVTEXT's posted agenda:
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/87/agenda/avtext/
> >
> > has them meeting on Tuesday at 1700, and they want to consider the
> result
> > of MMUSIC's discussions on draft-roach-mmusic-unified-plan - which
> > according to
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/87/agenda/mmusic/
> >
> > will take place on Wednesday, making this a little bit difficult absent
> > temporal manipulation.
> >
> > Perhaps the chairs should consult on whether it's worth swapping the two
> > days of MMUSIC discussion in order to accomodate the AVTEXT linkage?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 	Thanks
> >
> > 	    Ari & Flemming
> > 	_______________________________________________
> > 	mmusic mailing list
> > 	mmusic@ietf.org
> > 	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic