[MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Accept m- line, reject bundle

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Fri, 03 May 2013 13:07 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=98354f29d4=christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973A321F87B1 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2013 06:07:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.098, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FC+e60+rbPF6 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 May 2013 06:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6481621F89A6 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 May 2013 06:07:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7f3a6d0000007a4-24-5183b675ed7c
Received: from ESESSHC011.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id C9.DC.01956.576B3815; Fri, 3 May 2013 15:07:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.167]) by ESESSHC011.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.51]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Fri, 3 May 2013 15:07:00 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: BUNDLE: Accept m- line, reject bundle
Thread-Index: Ac5H/igNZNDXoaDWRAK0EIjSzLXMBA==
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 13:07:00 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36B4F6@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.20]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36B4F6ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrW7ptuZAgxlrxSymLn/M4sDosWTJ T6YAxihum6TEkrLgzPQ8fbsE7ozdP9+yFlxwr3gy9Q5jA+MSuy5GDg4JAROJhj8hXYycQKaY xIV769m6GLk4hAQOM0osvtbCDuEsZpQ4tr2BGaSBTcBCovufNkiDiIC6xNe9PcwgtrCAnkT/ jJ0sEHFjiWMTNrFC2HoSH05MBouzCKhIfPh3iA3E5hXwlTh7+CyYzQi0+PupNUwgNrOAuMSt J/OZIA4SkFiy5zwzhC0q8fLxP1YIW1Hi6vTlUPX5EtfObGSGmCkocXLmE5YJjEKzkIyahaRs FpIyiLiOxILdn9ggbG2JZQtfM8PYZw48ZkIWX8DIvoqRPTcxMye93HwTIzDsD275bbCDcdN9 sUOM0hwsSuK8yVyNgUIC6YklqdmpqQWpRfFFpTmpxYcYmTg4QQSXVAPjzmO1Z75lsH32+rIk WuNl8apMhyMXcuK/P71S4FaZ/mox8wf1lFU//39fuOjbN4HW0xYv8s4JLhDSFXygE8J57YUF x6Gy/H9JfAtrZzCaXE04/+lq/8kbuaVaVz7vD7q4W4KHv9y485ps5IECjqiDPdLZAo7s951v zoxUnCwX8OrbbMtNETKMSizFGYmGWsxFxYkA6hLK0E4CAAA=
Subject: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Accept m- line, reject bundle
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 13:07:11 -0000

Hi,

Assume the following case:


1.       An SDP offer contains an m- line associated with a BUNDLE group

2.       The answerer wants to accept the m- line, but wants to reject it being in the specific BUNDLE group.

A few alternatives on how this could be achieved have been presented:

Alt 1.      The answerer accepts the m- line, but does not associate it with a BUNDLE group.

Alt 2.      The answerer accepts the m- line, associates it with a BUNDLE group, and then sends a new offer which removes the m- line from the BUNDLE group.

Alt 3.      The answerer rejects the m- line, and then sends a new offer which adds the m- line outside a BUNDLE group.

In my opinion, Alt 1 does not work, at least not if the offer contains identical port values for the m- lines associated with the BUNDLE group. It would mean that the m- line is not added to a BUNDLE group, but still has the same port value (at least at the offerer side) as the m- lines in the BUNDLE group, which is not allowed.

So, my suggestion would be to specify that the answerer must use Alt 2 and/or Alt 3.

Comments?

Regards,

Christer