Re: [MMUSIC] [rtcweb] Tunnelling DTLS in SDP

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Mon, 04 April 2016 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7815412D0B9; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.22
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.22 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3lcJ1lA5APsH; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 928F612D0B0; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f79f86d00000400a-0e-5702ac38ca98
Received: from ESESSHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.36]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id B7.E9.16394.83CA2075; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 20:02:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.45]) by ESESSHC006.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 20:02:32 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Tunnelling DTLS in SDP
Thread-Index: AQHRjnOQTXAAgUuNbU6Yumm3JEpBMZ953U5w
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 18:02:32 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37F218C3@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <CABcZeBOM1KoXpXFhvjS753EVpsMENWVen3CCdFj8ry36vPH0dg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBOM1KoXpXFhvjS753EVpsMENWVen3CCdFj8ry36vPH0dg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.148]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B37F218C3ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprKIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7iq7FGqZwg/eL9S1WvD7HbjF1+WMW i7X/2tkdmD2WLPnJ5DH5cRtzAFMUl01Kak5mWWqRvl0CV8bR1/dZCy45V5zZ9JaxgfGBYxcj J4eEgInE9gV/mCFsMYkL99azdTFycQgJHGGUWDv3MpSziFFi95rt7F2MHBxsAhYS3f+0QRpE BFIkeo6dZASxhQV0JA4t2sgEEdeV2HdxNzuEbSRxb8sjsDiLgIrE41U/2UDG8Ar4Slx6VwgS FhIIkLjx8B/YGE6BQIkju5+A3cMIdM/3U2vAWpkFxCVuPZnPBHGngMSSPeehbhaVePn4HyuE rSTRuOQJK8h4ZoF8iRdXTEHCvAKCEidnPmGZwCgyC8mkWQhVs5BUQYQ1Jdbv0oeoVpSY0v2Q HcLWkGidM5cdWXwBI/sqRtHi1OKk3HQjY73Uoszk4uL8PL281JJNjMDIOrjlt+oOxstvHA8x CnAwKvHwLjjFGC7EmlhWXJl7iFGCg1lJhLdlJVO4EG9KYmVValF+fFFpTmrxIUZpDhYlcd7s yH9hQgLpiSWp2ampBalFMFkmDk6pBkbXmvWbrmX8CNn+0EHLa1dA2cTqHbH/uEKuBimHijyM l3DLZ5t7O0eizlbh4YMut4S38QtnnuDg2nDpz7WvXhv6f6Yc23b0tg9z2o2qz19ePmW2CK5r bxBIyJ/P78amsmWHvuWB359WW6+pm7eRS8r22Od3qqyGBs9jXt1guaLrt/V2T9zb/+xKLMUZ iYZazEXFiQAlEwhmqAIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/AQxBifNYToJh9ucTJvGyrYxur9Y>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] [rtcweb] Tunnelling DTLS in SDP
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 18:02:37 -0000

Hi,

Regarding forking, you cannot assume that forking entities will remove the SDP attribute. Unless they support the attribute, they will most likely just forward it. The offerer will find out if forking has occurred, but he answerer(s) will not know.

Regards,

Christer

From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eric Rescorla
Sent: 04 April 2016 16:11
To: mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>; rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: [rtcweb] Tunnelling DTLS in SDP

Hi folks,

I wanted to call your attention to a draft I just published with a possibly stupid
idea.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rescorla-dtls-in-sdp-00

A nontrivial fraction of call setup time in WebRTC is the DTLS handshake.
This document describes how to piggyback the first few handshake messages
in the SDP offer/answer exchange, thus reducing latency.

Comments welcome.

-Ekr