Archive

We know there is demand (from 3GPP), but we need contributors as well as 
reviewers to move forward with it, so thank you Paul. If anybody else is 
in a similar position, please let us know on the list.

Thanks

-- Flemming

On 4/3/19 9:40 AM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> I'm going to abstain on this because this ought to be about whether 
> there is demand, and I don't know.
>
> I will review/comment if it is adopted.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Paul
>
> On 4/3/19 7:34 AM, Bo Burman wrote:
>> MMUSIC,
>>
>> This is a 1-week call to re-adopt “Submit SDP Negotiation of MSRP 
>> over Data Channels as Proposed Standard” as an MMUSIC WG milestone, 
>> reviving the expired draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel 
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel/> 
>> as document.
>>
>> We have received renewed interest in progressing this draft and a 
>> number of people have stated that they are willing to work on it.
>>
>> If you support that adoption, please respond to the list by Friday 
>> April 12, 23:59 UTC. If you oppose WG adoption, have comments, or 
>> concerns, please reply either to this thread or directly to the 
>> chairs/authors (if needed).
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> /Bo
>>
>> MMUSIC co-chair
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmusic mailing list
>> mmusic@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
> .
>

Re: [MMUSIC] Re-adoption call for draft-ietf-mmusic-msrp-usage-data-channel