Re: [MMUSIC] Bundle offer with different ports - where to expect media?

Paul Kyzivat <> Tue, 21 May 2013 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFD121F9779 for <>; Tue, 21 May 2013 10:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.314
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.314 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.123, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YDhqhc2tPzW8 for <>; Tue, 21 May 2013 10:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:32]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF6421F985B for <>; Tue, 21 May 2013 10:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) by with comcast id ehAL1l0021HzFnQ53hSH0b; Tue, 21 May 2013 17:26:17 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([]) by with comcast id ehSH1l0043ZTu2S3ahSHz3; Tue, 21 May 2013 17:26:17 +0000
Message-ID: <>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 13:26:16 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=q20121106; t=1369157177; bh=KqMI1lJCxdn2LZwC6eLo5oppils3iBgqJHqeQajaTqU=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=dKc3CSl+KMJutUs5GasFsjSW/1o5Y2Z+7HIjTCaYmuf3g+rr66iSyoXB+CRrqpabw SIQur9yL3Gbc0gw5k1l5rOPEObXEWwGjZE4Lxm/0Vk40i6GGVjTyji69zhy6cEdJJc 3qit6qOqVrey9+dmqA/Om/csBr5B6OQXVLCYSC1VNoXgGiSJD4OSQZLvi37bZK/XvP yuJ5Qx9bK4gMkN3UJdbO+XsliT1xPxmPQJ6SPpDHUH2MBm0oGYfsdtLrBf1Kwmyt0A 6idHvsgTjIqLOJDM5RTweC9FMgmqIo67HNsArNtLU5Ud3rblu/ug5/UhRM8D3RB6oB iRto+8eV8us1A==
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Bundle offer with different ports - where to expect media?
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 17:26:53 -0000

On 5/21/13 10:38 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote:

> I don't know what people mean by splitting a bundle but I think one should be able to reject m lines inside a bundle, including the first m line, but I don't think there is a need to take offer lines 1,2,3, 4,5,6 in a bundle and have the answer put 1,2,3, in one bundle and 4,5,6 in a second bundle. So if that is what we mean by splitting bundle, I don't think we need it. But we do need to be able to reject m lines inside a bundle.

I agree that it is unrealistic to expect that we can get to separate 
bundles via just the answer to the offer.

But there is a need for a way to get to that condition *somehow*.

What I proposed was that the first answer could accept 1,2,3 in a bundle 
and reject (port zero) 4,5,6. Then in a subsequent offer, set a nonzero 
port in 4,5,6 and put them in a new bundle.