Re: [MMUSIC] ICE and offer/answer terminology
Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Thu, 06 March 2014 13:48 UTC
Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD801A01FE for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:48:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.925
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.925 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fE0xSCKi2T9z for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:48:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-x232.google.com (mail-ve0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D191A019C for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:48:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f178.google.com with SMTP id jw12so2590722veb.37 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 05:48:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=vDkH00FezZzie/bNBfqyNPekrkAHe6iBRmQwsN8/ejA=; b=nNltxx+Sf22NNevKOzYvGWYx6560HvElXW9pUOFSE+2b0U2hN/TePlvidL5zgPJeDe +MEzW1QgZqPQFbroppvnqHP9QxaaiLoRXA5McOacXIU4Phrz7wxT2eU2WTpgPmv1kY5v xLws/3FAUHC/+ZZ11hCphGTqie2XrDEIjoHK6EtBDgB52oBOpOnmZU50tqAWhbjA7rST PmKo33ilnjUqhKQRaak5WccpbP+o8q9H/tadm200BdlPPpNVFDEuyHeh4uOdqMOLZKBH abVrRIaq0RorMOw2K/bYxOYyxw5uoPx0kdOXgbaAZpnEIsVZMK0pIvm2ZSZZzCAUQIsY L+iA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=vDkH00FezZzie/bNBfqyNPekrkAHe6iBRmQwsN8/ejA=; b=J/HAoLOKwLDt/VWBDv1r1M2Wv++tzm6FGQrNgY+vXFWQQEl74iB+4awM4z9J+e/l6b Jr1/zN2tU33jaNzunj0KOfTahldFAwpbdVOtENCni/C0wEN1x9RqFIPrPR3a0mxiZpaq guPCNfTxL/rCBdWzeMTZ58139zvApsyhcTXwd4JOY36VOjRiivkpGI06FOoHiDY4mnzL Hoa9XT2mmDH7ar0nE9DkKYy9eCpZcnfrN7qBjZoZNc6p3eHFY2L5dsH3w9rS3aCgbigh SLb+xLhKiLgxK8qzCFGqAw45+SkH8UNWHnGX53shQVDm6y++/rZMIn0cvTEsu7KJ+hCf gXfQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQluEKqRXEwIOz2ZVlOyhZ3d3ZtW7D16skYygmlSfagaO/fgCz5MxogYcLjGDpp/AnBXTd06ge7UehmVAp7A6mERaB7JE0M76UBCDP2CkO/HAlzyavkrQX3jsauXkUupXIZgFNkHx8ZfD0rm/jR8trRoAqsDNCF6eJE9hsX++A+Ik+OUozhUxLQytnlgp+XqWied5DFy
X-Received: by 10.58.201.5 with SMTP id jw5mr5247356vec.6.1394113682930; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 05:48:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.26.43 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:47:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5318774D.5090705@alvestrand.no>
References: <9E803A35-8AF5-4F91-8280-0DD2263B71D5@ericsson.com> <5318774D.5090705@alvestrand.no>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:47:42 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-3gFQ=xvz9=ZzZ23m+CvbKgK2OPpxPv9h56qFwNoXg9GQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bd6aea2d91c6404f3f0626b"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/B0op2fiqvxwfKPK6nvDhfcqNL_0
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] ICE and offer/answer terminology
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:48:10 -0000
The ICE ufrag/pwd and options do need to be exchanged somehow, but we could
just call them the local and remote ICE configurations.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>wrote:
> On 03/05/2014 06:39 PM, Ari Keränen wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We didn't have time for this open issue on Monday meeting so we'll take it here on the list.
>
> While ICE is no longer bound to SIP and SDP offer/answer, the document uses terms "offer" and "answer" heavily, starting in the title ("ICE: A Protocol for NAT Traversal for Offer/Answer Protocols") and abstract ("ICE can be used by any protocol utilizing the offer/answer model [...]").
>
> I think we need to update the title and abstract so that it's more clear that protocols that don't follow the o/a model are not excluded. Text suggestions are welcome. Maybe in title we call this just "ICE: A Protocol for NAT Traversal".
>
> Then, throughout the text we need to refer to the exchange of candidates somehow. Originally this was referred to as the "SDP offer" and "SDP answer". Currently we use "ICE offer" and "ICE answer". My suggestion would be to keep the "(ICE) offer/answer" terminology here but clarify in the beginning of the document that with the offer and answer we refer to the ICE candidate exchange.
>
> Opinions?
>
>
> Given that we do not have any requirement that exchange of candidates
> happen in a particular sequence, I suggest that we call this "exchange of
> candidates", not "offer/answer".
>
> Examples of models where offer/answer would be a misnomer:
>
> - All participants write their candidates into a common server-side store;
> participants wishing to communicate fetch the candidate sets for the
> entities they wish to communicate with, as long as the candidate set is
> fresh enough.
>
> - Trickle ICE
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Ari
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing listmmusic@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>
>
>
> --
> Surveillance is pervasive. Go Dark.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>
>
- Re: [MMUSIC] ICE and offer/answer terminology Justin Uberti
- [MMUSIC] ICE and offer/answer terminology Ari Keränen
- Re: [MMUSIC] ICE and offer/answer terminology Stach, Thomas
- Re: [MMUSIC] ICE and offer/answer terminology Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [MMUSIC] ICE and offer/answer terminology Jonathan Lennox
- Re: [MMUSIC] ICE and offer/answer terminology Emil Ivov
- Re: [MMUSIC] ICE and offer/answer terminology Ari Keränen