Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE DECISSION: SDP Answer Restrictions

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Tue, 28 May 2013 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=3860d0bb4d=christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B07A21F9735 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2013 09:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.868
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.868 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.381, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sy36Hdf7osi0 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2013 09:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0179D21F9734 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 May 2013 09:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7f8a6d000001a2d-30-51a4e0a49bfc
Received: from ESESSHC021.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 99.A1.06701.4A0E4A15; Tue, 28 May 2013 18:51:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.167]) by ESESSHC021.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.81]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Tue, 28 May 2013 18:51:48 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE DECISSION: SDP Answer Restrictions
Thread-Index: Ac5YdJNWNYfYqobOTueV815jNgS21wCWRNCAAAYVf+EAMcazAAAFl7AA
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 16:51:47 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C37AF52@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C377967@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB11351850D@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C379AEC@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CABkgnnW5+x8Bakndk2x72b6iWMTvQ1fCwjaHDKYaiNBr0RZhcw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnW5+x8Bakndk2x72b6iWMTvQ1fCwjaHDKYaiNBr0RZhcw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: fi-FI
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.146]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrBLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre6SB0sCDd5P0LfomMxmce3MP0aL qcsfszgwe0z5vZHVY+esu+weS5b8ZApgjuK2SUosKQvOTM/Tt0vgznhy7BtzwTW2infvChoY D7B1MXJwSAiYSPy4Y93FyAlkiklcuLceKMzFISRwmFFiwZWd7BDOEkaJ5k9HwBrYBCwkuv9p gzSICOhKLDr7gB3EZhaIkJi/eyuYLSxgL3Hp/gc2iBoHiWnHF7ND2G4Sr9+9A4uzCKhKzDv2 jxXE5hXwlZj+7B4rxK7ZTBLvtl9iBklwCgRKnL/7jwXEZgS67vupNUwQy8QlPhy8zgxxtYDE kj3noWxRiZePIYZKCChJ/NhwiQXkZmYBTYn1u/QhWhUlpnQ/ZIfYKyhxcuYTlgmMYrOQTJ2F 0DELSccsJB0LGFlWMbLnJmbmpJebb2IERszBLb8NdjBuui92iFGag0VJnFefd3GgkEB6Yklq dmpqQWpRfFFpTmrxIUYmDk4QwSXVwGg9zfP8t2UcM/YZPyrU0PvC4XY0qkI4/eU//xniVzdV PFwQsvTVfYej+28fez0v+kbq4/RnLZefbGKI0JzBbpyqsey5QGpCo9SZ5otqdiWav6L+tSvn Xan0j1435SUXc+QSM4OHUhn1IgU/gl7cs/S8XHK677zK7MU1n3wn5U7ekM0taf3/6m4lluKM REMt5qLiRADKcRovawIAAA==
Cc: "Cullen Jennings \(fluffy\)" <fluffy@cisco.com>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE DECISSION: SDP Answer Restrictions
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 16:51:57 -0000

Hi,
 
>> But, if you disagree with 4, which port do you think the offerer shall use for receiving media? It cannot use the "bundle port", as the answerer removed the m- line from the bundle group.
>
>I think that you need to be clearer in your description of 4.  Rather than:
> 4)      an m- line MUST NOT be removed from a BUNDLE group if, in the associated offer, an identical port number was indicated for all m- lines in a BUNDLE group
>
> Use words like unbundled instead perhaps.  And it's not MUST NOT, it's simply "cannot".

My intention was to add a NOTE, with some "cannot" text.

Regards,

Christer