Re: [MMUSIC] WGLC for latest set of changes in RTSP 2.0 (draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-35)

Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com> Thu, 26 September 2013 01:57 UTC

Return-Path: <fandreas@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4CC511E80FC for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:57:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Iqy7HQoTcZ4L for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D5021F8AF4 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2225; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1380160615; x=1381370215; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=v91XJQHxRfCqy59DQnCVQsjvhPvAolMMB9guR5Qxqb4=; b=YMhOm4NsFWOPPhJEO5uqHpFo/E+T/cddvJ18DQHOCHBzYH/ylhuxM8x1 ACoHGkJI0yW8g87R5YSVyvdw1v/Eql2IZbOdZ8iduT1S87FDCWZbA1WDx pu+to++XraDScF0AiCixaimcOfGxhR5OVT1ZUjI68py7nO6DlAj5o3Jvd M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnoNAEuTQ1KtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABbgwc4rGYDk3xKgSAWdIIlAQEBBAEBATU2CgEQCxgJFg8JAwIBAgEVMAYNAQUCAQEFh30MvEmPUQeEHgOXfJF3gWaBWiA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,982,1371081600"; d="scan'208";a="264552551"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2013 01:56:52 +0000
Received: from bxb-fandreas-8816.cisco.com (bxb-fandreas-8816.cisco.com [10.98.149.199]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8Q1up9w015045; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 01:56:52 GMT
Message-ID: <52439463.8010900@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 21:56:51 -0400
From: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
References: <522E1F94.1090804@cisco.com> <5231B124.60408@ericsson.com> <52414EE6.1040602@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <52414EE6.1040602@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis@tools.ietf.org>, mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] WGLC for latest set of changes in RTSP 2.0 (draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-35)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 01:57:05 -0000

Thank you Magnus

This concludes the WGLC of the -35 changes. Since we have not received 
any further comments, the draft is ready to move forward.

Regards

-- Flemming (MMUSIC co-chair)


On 9/24/13 4:35 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> WG,
>
> I have updated the draft to change from RFC 2822 to RFC 5322 for the
> date format. With this change I believed to have addressed all
> outstanding issues.
>
> Cheers
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
>
> On 2013-09-12 15:18, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
>> WG,
>>
>> Christian Groves sent me a question regarding the usage of RFC 2822
>> format in the Date, Expires, If-Modified-Since, Last-Modified and
>> Retry-After headers. I hadn't changed this despite being somewhat aware
>> of the fact that this specification used a obsoleted RFC as normative
>> reference. However, his question made be recheck the differences in
>> format between RFC 2822 and RFC 5322 and although the formulation of the
>> syntax description has been changed, I think the actual syntax is
>> untouched. Thus I suggest we update the reference to use RFC 5322
>> section 3.3.
>>
>> Any objections to this?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Magnus
>>
>> On 2013-09-09 21:20, Flemming Andreasen wrote:
>>> Greetings
>>>
>>> Following WGLC and a few additional updates and maling list discussions
>>> subsequently, we requested publication of 2326bis-34. As a result of the
>>> IESG and Gen-Art review, several updates have been made to the document
>>> and we are hereby issuing a 2-week WGLC for those changes to give the WG
>>> participants a chance to review them as well. If you have any comments
>>> on the changes between -34 and -35, please make sure to send those to
>>> the mailing list and the authors no later than Monday September 23, 2013.
>>>
>>> The relevant diff-file can be accessed at:
>>>
>>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-34&difftype=--html&submit=Go%21&url2=draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc2326bis-35
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> -- Ari & Flemming (MMUSIC co-chairs)
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mmusic mailing list
>>> mmusic@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>>
>>>
>>
>