IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Considerations) in draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-06

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sun, 05 December 2021 03:57 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A353A104E; Sat, 4 Dec 2021 19:57:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id brez5-KdbAol; Sat, 4 Dec 2021 19:57:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x929.google.com (mail-ua1-x929.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::929]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DD343A0121; Sat, 4 Dec 2021 19:57:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x929.google.com with SMTP id j14so13070214uan.10; Sat, 04 Dec 2021 19:57:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=p6FSG/1UWfoCkobMVrvfkzykMl4M1DNlrYSxTLCDsVs=; b=l6BCfvMe9Y2Mlvt2dm0dlvyass2u2GlzCUnDHTZzlFgmMkMCqPte5wPil19GOL95fb Rt5tY9YPKwuJWklkIwQodOi19QNIX563nsYJNflJTcMNnuiGsSzKlHKW9U6tDHD1eO5V wz6aiMfOc6gUNInqieER5bzL4Bw9lMCpuazzn0yD1sZiXHGkg3zTl1L8XBtmrRheHbR4 GFyTAjoBy1Jpx4kRb1y5L1Cc4RhwrZ8/HEB5SCa5R5Pi+LSt4bH7unxEL1EBo75b4LWk 6t3fybV9etx217BsxKAp52g+04zXrzKgxcniixRwvDFWIkYmSRnxWqVJfOcRKyvMHZvv IAzQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=p6FSG/1UWfoCkobMVrvfkzykMl4M1DNlrYSxTLCDsVs=; b=pTCUGJZRto9pKnC97SZEHYh9hbOJ2LTegvr+CxhNu5IAA/RnA4dFgs3zijkPRF4rmf R4B4/rEhBi+QFqZ3pwhHkNGhq7+9D3MhBnXwTJvjqu596YAJjtZUG7dZ0IoDX1+E97pB fNFKrSEz0aKeqan8/WfrvkYaULEYOUynOMGRPmWPquwt5J5k8GkUPAxe29mH6WvSeeMF 4CUTTgxxuyEKVmvUoWw5twFW/NBiR6DNLdg8dc8CKyOYpTD2rppMCEGnlA76ZCfoEFWm SMKNdpxZUNZmAENgoU1FleGruXnJBxS6ZVpxZMWQL+NpUcet2vKbfNbImpaGoULQFXi7 LKWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532OovLf3EcBoCuuLL4ID+cRzHcKT81YtRJwgNLB6Jn3rUMVPaA0 Rxafc4A3Gknb8f7HQfptUMhWxf9Sey228jvZjOY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxd3g5EZkPXRF32kIlY3k1jUq5WHv3OrqwYVL7TjbMwlk5YD2CSmIGUd1wiVt2T+eLCyEy4/7JDAQH9/NtFON4=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:4465:: with SMTP id m92mr32277457uam.47.1638676620607; Sat, 04 Dec 2021 19:57:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <443b55f8-9d42-6728-de87-36a8392aaa10@cisco.com> <CAOLzse3aNuKCp9jSXyzAdLjpaCZUzL4K071k3zLTWoE3Fry-BA@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB4441163C03DA3FA9A88B0114939F9@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAOLzse1JMd=re=96OQR1qD6wj_SJnwRdUGAzU69k4v=gr4LcvQ@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB44419673CDC9E5C1CD76F04593609@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAOLzse3e0bmNwkz_2T6QvpQYs5Q3dqB8YnEoVQp=YRPhGP+6Vw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxs25qiRvvFZDzda2CWun3MAwZxz8WrGYJdDHEgdB1d0ng@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB44415ADB77F0EA6B8732DB2393619@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAOLzse3yFO+iAWEeqrv_WZTZZi0xO3C3pGL+G13-59N4+kgj-A@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB44418958A9C748993B42342293649@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAD5OKxuwy6dJdZfvmHtTSwdffz0efiWRkf6fVGLoDJD2kgayfw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOLzse26gsHrTfffeFanKPh+zBUvo4bB29MeuKsVWrq2gyq-2w@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB44419D003F32B7992D8208BB93669@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <da187426-670e-8a00-cfb5-d562213dcf7d@cisco.com> <HE1PR07MB444195E3707CCABC34326B2E93699@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAD5OKxtnAg+XwRmHyTczQGByhu6oeAjBmgV_BD5vgbedD1pJpw@mail.gmail.com> <VI1PR07MB4447D45204EFAEF7F7928E37936A9@VI1PR07MB4447.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <HE1PR07MB4441B9EB1CC4682AF0E65B7D936A9@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAD5OKxuz+yGSakmsUv9UjFUnruROG2ZCOqTQ3ix0b8i4snZs8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZJY2g0WRBMT3x=pngkSk+j6=_-_muUgPWwe5f4tzhvZA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZJY2g0WRBMT3x=pngkSk+j6=_-_muUgPWwe5f4tzhvZA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2021 19:56:49 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYJCQb6R0Bvep-O-Qos-3ygsZXX+dyDmGD6NRzHZMOYzA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>, "mmusic-chairs@ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@ietf.org>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000df85bb05d25e2142"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/CHopOjxlMAir6PIQtunq6DQzbhw>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Considerations) in draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-06
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2021 03:57:07 -0000

On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 12:57 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for the extra effort to clear this up.
>
> I've reviewed the change between -04 (which the IESG approved) and -08
> (the current version) and find the changes are largely informative only, so
> I don't think a second IETF-wide Last Call is necessary.  I'm going to
> indicate such to the IESG and give them a few days to object; absent any
> such objections, I'll release it from its IESG hold in the RFC Editor queue.
>

It was noted that an errant "PCC" has appeared in the Abstract in -08.  You
can post a -09 without it if you like, or we can just ensure the RFC Editor
removes it prior to AUTH48.

-MSK

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status