IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Trickle, privacy and bogus addresses

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 14 March 2013 20:18 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39F421F8CE2 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YJGl6yeY4118 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com (mail-wg0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A46611E8126 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id dr13so2368459wgb.26 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:18:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3Ct26ezmoidtNe/1TijpBLMUtaiYd/DJiZ2MJepQu8U=; b=Wrtun+Lw6/SREZiphqZcQD7jSBKxpqFWTw+hqYFog24mhicEnOD2ojBVdlweKEkwhw k5eIQxcmMTlbvo0rcXoHuXVTjEXyKnWYjptOpaIejXiBA5baec3KE1eUrVqFtRYw/GPv qJizlnr5lqqwje/OLO4Mgcs76nvB/wcGCbFL4QcUlua6K7BHQyRczoANZuBDSKqvpgWf 3to7ueXkcsQtSq0jg3OHN7rpbe8LGZdwfCTONCOFKEXAjyOdxcCwA0MKaYIHAqbpmRmX tNjXp2OMCkiK9QM1KF0apooGkPjPRXNV/bOg5FmYWBcsGAOP1PCr/Q/BJbsDekr75cOF pkWA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.75.177 with SMTP id d17mr6662335wiw.16.1363292331324; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:18:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.5.135 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:18:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51422F4A.8000103@jitsi.org>
References: <CABkgnnW_epOmud_=uVoLvcipeC=5ukG+daJ3axa-tc72CPzCgw@mail.gmail.com> <51422F4A.8000103@jitsi.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:18:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWxDX2yDiB1BLa=QDeazKo9DVyHfRB=6VAKCJ9P_SCvyg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Trickle, privacy and bogus addresses
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:18:54 -0000

On 14 March 2013 16:12, Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> wrote:
> On 14.03.13, 16:00, Martin Thomson wrote:
>> Someone proposed that we use 0.0.0.1:9 to signal "no candidates".
>>
>> I don't believe this to be necessary and would rather we don't go there at all.
>
> When we talked about this on Tuesday, it appeared as if we had consensus
> and the only issue was about making a choice between one of the many
> possible options. (127..., 0.0.0.X, something else that IANA would
> allocate for us).
>
> How do you get from that to "I'd rather we didn't do it at all" ?

I applied some brain cycles to the problem, talked to a few people.

I'll find you and walk through the proof.  It's not especially complicated.

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email