Re: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC Working Group Virtual Interim Meeting, June 17, 2013

Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com> Wed, 05 June 2013 02:29 UTC

Return-Path: <fandreas@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6384D21F9B20 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 19:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id spw2ALCzE4vB for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 19:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-1.cisco.com (mtv-iport-1.cisco.com [173.36.130.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4530021F9B33 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2013 19:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2701; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1370398882; x=1371608482; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hBEPERZZuXsT6gmKcZ+0+y89kdwcFeVSYDmeVzHwJrg=; b=JjoDR7kZzxOKLzdk3ORS2VsDaf6KiWYLHYlPRzdpSxH0sf5/1TWZZbJA CtHlAR0CrNhMnZuQ7PAsHHCI5u2PZG+LIH8B6IfV6nXCBvZF01toSdERG 3TQAulTKVoCe1KAhq//vsrulVJPGCcl/MSeTmshl+EiZ9+04GE8j3Uehd A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMFAASgrlGrRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABagwkwvyqBABZ0giMBAQEDAQEBATU2CgEFCwsOCgkWDwkDAgECARUwBg0BBQIBAQWHfgUNvUyPJAeDWwOXP4EpkBeDKyA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,803,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="79759467"
Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by mtv-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Jun 2013 02:21:02 +0000
Received: from Flemmings-MacBook-Pro.local ([10.156.16.115]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r552L1UT025943; Wed, 5 Jun 2013 02:21:01 GMT
Message-ID: <51AEA08D.8090103@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 22:21:01 -0400
From: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
References: <20130530185619.4124.56395.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <51A87F91.2080500@jitsi.org>
In-Reply-To: <51A87F91.2080500@jitsi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Ari Keranen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>, mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC Working Group Virtual Interim Meeting, June 17, 2013
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 02:29:09 -0000

On 5/31/13 6:46 AM, Emil Ivov wrote:
> Dear chairs,
>
> Could you please also consider the following draft for the interim 
> meeting agenda:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ivov-rtcweb-noplan
>
Sure, however I could use some clarification here. On one hand, the 
draft falls squarely in the middle of the overall "Plan" discussion we 
have and hence is highly relevant, but at the same time, if I understand 
correctly, the draft is not asking MMUSIC to do anything in terms of 
protocol development. Rather, if this approach is adopted, it would be 
more of an RTCWeb usage document specifying how one could use several 
different mechanisms (and possibly WebRTC APIs) to implement signaling. 
There doesn't seem to be a "mandatory to implement" mechanism for 
guaranteeing interoperability (in contrast to Plan A/B), but rather 
there are references to "app specific signalling" mechanisms, etc. Am I 
missing something here ?


> I apologise if not stating this earlier has introduced any confusion.
>
No worries.

Thanks

-- Flemming

> Regards,
> Emil
>
> On 30.05.13, 21:56, IESG Secretary wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> This is to announce a(nother) virtual interim meeting for the MMUSIC
>> Working Group to take place on Monday, June 17, from 7:00 am - 10:00 am
>> Pacific Time. The goal of this meeting is to come to a resolution on the
>> so-called "Plan A" or "Plan B" approach related to SDP signaling needed
>> by RTCWeb, CLUE, etc. (i.e. do we have potentially lots of "m=" lines or
>> very few "m=" lines and to what extent is there sub-negotation and
>> signaling at the SSRC level).
>>
>> A more detailed agenda and logistics will be sent out separately on the
>> MMUSIC mailing list. For now, people should take a close look at the
>> following two drafts:
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-roach-rtcweb-plan-a-00.txt
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00.txt
>>
>> You may also want to look at
>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-roach-rtcweb-glareless-add-00.txt
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -- Ari & Flemming (MMUSIC co-chairs)
>>
>>
>> PS: Per our previous interim meeting announcement, we tried to schedule
>> a longer and in-person physical interim meeting, however it has proven
>> impossible to find a set of dates where we could get critical mass for
>> such a meeting. Scheduling even a virtual interim before the Berlin IETF
>> has been surprisingly difficult with the above date being the only
>> viable option at this point.
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmusic mailing list
>> mmusic@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>
>