[MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Allowed to change local bundle port in SDP Answer?

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Wed, 29 May 2013 09:35 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=08612b889a=christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F01E21F90CD for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2013 02:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.329, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ivZtecrmEwoh for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2013 02:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4638C21F9121 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2013 02:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f5d6d000003d54-76-51a5cbe753a5
Received: from ESESSHC009.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 1F.56.15700.7EBC5A15; Wed, 29 May 2013 11:35:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.167]) by ESESSHC009.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.45]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Wed, 29 May 2013 11:35:35 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: BUNDLE: Allowed to change local bundle port in SDP Answer?
Thread-Index: Ac5cT7iTJh+UkTvAQrimrMBFim1gCA==
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 09:35:35 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C37B7B6@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.17]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C37B7B6ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrFLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre6L00sDDb6dYbSYuvwxiwOjx5Il P5kCGKO4bZISS8qCM9Pz9O0SuDMezFzHVvBfvuJd4ymWBsYP0l2MnBwSAiYSE/ovM0HYYhIX 7q1nA7GFBA4zSkyYHtLFyAVkL2GU+P/lDnsXIwcHm4CFRPc/bZAaEQF1ia97e5hBbGEBZ4nn q/cwQsQ9JG69b2GCsPUk3jzZDWazCKhKtO27BzafV8BXov14DzuIzQi09/upNWA1zALiEree zIe6R0BiyZ7zzBC2qMTLx/9YQU6QEFCUWN4vB1GeL/F16UVWiJGCEidnPmGZwCg0C8mkWUjK ZiEpg4jrSCzY/YkNwtaWWLbwNTOMfebAYyZk8QWM7KsY2XMTM3PSyw03MQKD/uCW37o7GE+d EznEKM3BoiTOq8e7OFBIID2xJDU7NbUgtSi+qDQntfgQIxMHJ4jgkmpgLPj9eOazAAuuk6ti ZhgvLPzIVyzR47oiL+1Fm8D7F0FtNTNmnmbmnmnnFvlRSqTswA0RjzXfl56bqDu7Rrzie2r0 rrDwInux1OksM++sfszI9iuX8U/FpcqNW8s/ZIndmmn+dyfD03sJ7Fnzujd/eZaUfrG3s1Pr s3b8lVQeybJbmt7eZ2/OUmIpzkg01GIuKk4EALFh1ZJNAgAA
Subject: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Allowed to change local bundle port in SDP Answer?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 09:35:44 -0000

Hi,

When the answerer receives the first bundle offer, it will assign a local bundle port. Nothing strange there.

Paul raised a question whether, when an updated offer is received, the answerer is allowed to change the local bundle port in the associated answer.

Personally, I can't think of a reason why it should not be allowed - no matter whether the offer contains different bundle ports or not - it would be according to normal O/A procedures.

If NOT allowed, if the answerer wants to change its local bundle port, it would have to send a new offer by itself (the details of such offer is discussed in another tread).

Comments?

Regards,

Christer