IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE DECISION Q6: Do we always mandate 2 Offer/Answers during session establishment?

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Wed, 13 November 2013 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A5D11E8159 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:02:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.257
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.257 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.180, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OVI6CNwAOb0T for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:02:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D8F11E80EA for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:02:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.44]) by qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id p5pn1m0010xGWP85462DqA; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:02:13 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta12.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id p62C1m00V3ZTu2S3Y62CiN; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:02:13 +0000
Message-ID: <5283BEA3.4040805@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:02:11 -0800
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C518151@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C518151@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1384365733; bh=wHPv8FDcLX9+8KMipzWLM8UKIFRDvcxNHnJ96SbGZbI=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=DCgX+MpSTbY6LIdD0C/h1BIStghAAZchBsH10CuBWikmm6FrrwQ+RCNzwRU4m4mUX wBpAfkMdet2d98vG2dWOMjB06nIkux47Yw3aeD4cRSTDSrCRGq6wSVCiVD27LO1HSB rrE7g8Gnw8fJtFkVgqlm82ps0WfHeXJhoOyaW7Buwp73yRgoSKWsWVaUOKmfkf6Wk5 YTX5B//eRfTj9JUXc38/BBB03T5sIVS9cOvI5IfVWGMUf3oiMBOZmSzm4eH63Zyo1v FffbV6xLIeg4LfSVaIOdWguxHI+I9B/DupXlrI3YPGtZJcale85ggnBMjkzRRRtkFa hiKExGEyVKs7w==
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE DECISION Q6: Do we always mandate 2 Offer/Answers during session establishment?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:02:19 -0000

Christer,

This works for me except for one thing: the word "session", which I fear 
is sufficiently ambiguous to present trouble.

I suggest using "multi-media session". (We can't use "SIP session" or 
"SIP dialog" because this might be used without SIP.)

	Thanks,
	Paul

On 11/12/13 3:39 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In Vancouver we decided that an Offerer MUST NOT assign a shared address (with a non-zero port) to multiple m- lines until the Answerer, within the session, has indicated support of BUNDLE.
>
> I suggest the following piece of text to implement  the decision in the BUNDLE spec:
>
> 	"The Offerer MUST NOT assign a shared address with a non-zero port
>     	value to multiple "m=" lines until it has, within the given session,
>     	received an SDP Answer indicating that the Answerer supports the
>     	BUNDLE mechanism."
>
> Note that there will be specific text regarding the usage of port zero for 'bundle-only' m- lines.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email