[MMUSIC] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-04: (with COMMENT)
Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 25 August 2021 13:23 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5FF3A0366; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 06:23:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Francesca Palombini via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis@ietf.org, mmusic-chairs@ietf.org, mmusic@ietf.org, fandreas@cisco.com, fandreas@cisco.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.36.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Francesca Palombini <francesca.palombini@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <162989780435.28737.10737386526426566217@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 06:23:24 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/Fn4Apa9yppAMTOOme0aeqz1v7DM>
Subject: [MMUSIC] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 13:23:25 -0000
Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work on this document. Thanks to Claudio Allocchio for the ART ART review: I agree with him that mentioning IETF 110 in Section 1.4 seem strange, and I would suggest rewording to remove that. Additionally in the same section, mentioning erratas by their numbers does not help a reader who is not familiar with the IETF errata reporting system: instead, I would suggest to rephrase so to give a high level summary to the reader about what these erratas were about. Below, two nits I happened to notice. Francesca ## Nits 1. ---- * In a subsequent offer, or in an answer (initial of subsequent), FP: s/of/or 2. ---- If the answer wants to move the "m=" section out of the BUNDLE group, it will have to first accept it FP: s/answer/answerer
- [MMUSIC] Francesca Palombini's No Objection on dr… Francesca Palombini via Datatracker
- Re: [MMUSIC] Francesca Palombini's No Objection o… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] Francesca Palombini's No Objection o… Francesca Palombini