Re: [MMUSIC] ICE offer/answer/candidate exchange terminology

Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net> Fri, 25 September 2015 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <peter@andyet.net>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9C01A9057 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y4AY1iui-a7V for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com (mail-io0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDF391A9064 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ioii196 with SMTP id i196so115567521ioi.3 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:55:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OpCsXNxn4Ws3AgHCqkj0SYeHb1O4FXw7Muii6ppE0Y8=; b=HkVivsvU5cJchOrVFAjCsEvIgf9CrcghMB2QS0cb+4dHTM+co6wePmPO/oDJvJo9Lw N+OTDNvBTK2DHhJY4pm0Gnf725LbZG+Y8lt/Y4m+VxqzIeCGyAuXL/3xaPr0IJBNoOxG BMit5UVfyD8ZRyMpO8WQcgKbLopa8FUc1oZmdFsIgvQog1sLBezaGSi6HUXWRgaWquc1 WOrg2OeveDBKmjEFg//f7eOKQYgqsug7ZClQcSqGccIQkJg2y0q/wDnWR5SavM76rbJ/ eeajtWhQSLVRF96Mk564162asd4HmeD6UmLloUf64TjaLV1E1C9rdfkLiWS4yLxqa2I7 9qeA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmcoXSwCCOVf/qgrzFf8pxIWQCEsAAmQfCHLjOxVpZeMYdjmabMAS0txs02US/vAQp8nbCg
X-Received: by 10.107.3.168 with SMTP id e40mr7106901ioi.151.1443196519837; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aither.local ([2601:282:4201:ef5b:9579:b86a:3768:8159]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id yq9sm1572759igb.6.2015.09.25.08.55.16 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Sep 2015 08:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ari_Ker=c3=a4nen?= <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>, mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
References: <56056142.20608@ericsson.com>
From: Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <peter@andyet.net>
Message-ID: <56056E62.3040904@andyet.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:55:14 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56056142.20608@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/GH_iLb6pnCO8wHPG9vslyFrOqBw>
Cc: "Suhas Nandakumar \(snandaku\)" <snandaku@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] ICE offer/answer/candidate exchange terminology
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 15:55:22 -0000

On 9/25/15 8:59 AM, Ari Keränen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For quite some time now we have had discussions on how could we best get
> rid of the remaining RFC3264 offer/answer language in ICEbis.
>
> Together with Suhas and Pål-Erik we discussed this off-line and came to
> conclusion that we have two reasonable options for the "offer/answer
> part" of the terminology: "ICE offer & ICE answer" and "ICE candidate
> exchange".

Given the existence of trickle ICE, I much prefer "candidate exchange".

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/