Re: [MMUSIC] Please Read and Comment: Re: ICE SDP/JSEP peace accords

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 22 January 2019 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C829131141 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:36:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AUq4ufo4vYRN for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D8E6131136 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Svantevit.roach.at (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x0MLabWL013561 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:36:40 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1548193001; bh=7KnHOiWht8bt1hF/5Cc8SjGFoHRUrgFhJg2GNb75lL0=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=sYshlqSlYCJmNqzajCkWwhCVEOreCOFMVAME1sBkMkwuGC68ZIh2csjZVYmww1tPs fih9VVPt8QtuIEoDHQpAJeFpxbZnLvfNDC75Y5GPi33oL8JqHE4JwVmwE6G88be7ON DathaF/lUcgEWZRFeFT5LZ0tPQGhfYcNHBhdFG3o=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.roach.at
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Cc: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
References: <0454609c-ce69-80d4-93d8-f89bc8ba897e@nostrum.com> <CAD5OKxu1bPDU_snQ=H7RwVgPKW_hKJY1Nj7g82vTpJ+gorPrYQ@mail.gmail.com> <f279e997-0236-b78c-e555-5189d9818ef2@nostrum.com> <9B6124BE-E369-4327-B759-77DB0ED8A484@ericsson.com> <6f42b5c5-72f0-8d6a-c68d-d19da7d94353@cisco.com> <HE1PR07MB3161189A6405D403F433F17293980@HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAD5OKxvNYnARbw5yvSHCeQUiSMRxQdMj9h5zUeXj+o3Nd8Kh-g@mail.gmail.com> <3e17ec5d-e6b2-5d38-e206-2ed7b8b9c690@nostrum.com> <CAD5OKxtzxOfE9O-G5tQ1C_sg8LHQBxpNATJi_ee-UVcp0gdb2w@mail.gmail.com> <ab0940dd-9ad0-d012-5530-a6a35dd659e9@nostrum.com> <CAD5OKxtgRZErxSfPOQd1xts4zg+1RWuYFOZSey=HgG-Y9g0Dhw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <b7c0eb29-d11b-1a54-5325-d8fccb1c778d@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:36:31 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxtgRZErxSfPOQd1xts4zg+1RWuYFOZSey=HgG-Y9g0Dhw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8494691C670AE80693E1FA16"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/GOZytVf3S4LFVKph7yK-v_3N0aY>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Please Read and Comment: Re: ICE SDP/JSEP peace accords
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 21:36:48 -0000

On 1/22/19 3:33 PM, Roman Shpount wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 4:25 PM Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com 
> <mailto:adam@nostrum.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 1/22/19 3:15 PM, Roman Shpount wrote:
>     > The issue is the offer generated when ICE restart is not
>     initiated and
>     > TCP candidate is currently nominated. TCP candidate is the only
>     > candidate which is present in both offer and answer. It is also the
>     > default candidate. No UDP candidate will be added it any point
>     during
>     > the offer/answer exchange.
>
>
>     This is what I tried to indicate with the use of an italicized
>     "always"
>     in my previous reply.
>
>     EVEN IF it is generating an offer when ICE restart is initiated
>     and the
>     TCP candidate is nominated, Chrome will still always (always, always)
>     generate an SDP that includes a UDP candidate and use that
>     candidate's
>     value in the m=/o= lines.
>
> Unless I am mistaken, if ICE restart is not initiated, only the 
> nominated candidate must be included. No other candidates must be 
> present. If Chrome does not follow this, then it is most likely not 
> complaint with either ICE or JSEP specifications.


Based on the conversation I had with their engineers, that seems to be 
the case.

/a