Re: [MMUSIC] Issue #4 from Magnus on draft-ietf-mmusic-media-loopback-16

Hi:

In my comments posted in this mail:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg08958.html

I suggested to rename the draft to: "An extension to SDP and RTP for 
media loopback".

While I don't care much of the exact words, I think the terms "SDP", 
"RTP" and "media loopback" need all be in the title of the document. Your 
proposal misses "SDP", so, if you add it, I will agree.

BR,

       Miguel

On 21/11/2011 19:57, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
>
>
>
> On Oct 21, 2011, at 5:25 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
>
>> 4. Title: I think the title is indicating that this is only an SDP
>> solution, but it clearly contains the considerations needed for the
>> RTP/RTCP part also. I think it should reflect that it is a solution for
>> RTP transported media loopback including SDP signalling.
>
> I propose the following title:
> "A Media Loopback Mechanism for Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP)"
>
> Does anyone object?
>
> -hadriel
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>

-- 
Miguel A. Garcia
+34-91-339-3608
Ericsson Spain