[MMUSIC] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-12: (with COMMENT)
"Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 01 February 2017 14:33 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F510129468; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 06:33:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.41.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148595959412.19146.5607036387011046763.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 06:33:14 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/HaHN-vg59azuu93Mv1mMzQuYRtA>
Cc: fandreas@cisco.com, mmusic-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update@ietf.org, mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: [MMUSIC] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 14:33:14 -0000
Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update-12: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-4572-update/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I had two (or 4 depending how you count:-) things I'd like to check here. They were pretty easy to handle. (We more or less resolved this by mail.) (1) section 5: I'm wondering if we have the right set of hash functions here. Deprecating md2 and md5 is great, but I have a bunch of questions about the others: (1.1) why not also say that sha-1 MUST NOT be used for new things (or similar)? (1.2) do you really need sha-224 and 384? I think nobody uses those at all. (1.3) I'm a bit surprised you didn't add sha3 (and maybe remove sha-512 if that's not needed) Even if you don't encourage use of sha3, it might be good to include it in the abnf now in case it gets popular. (2) Wouldn't it be a good plan to say that TLS as-used MUST conform to BCP195? If not, why not?
- [MMUSIC] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-… Stephen Farrell