Re: [MMUSIC] Fixing draft-holmberg-mmusic-sdp-dtls-00

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Wed, 17 June 2015 20:03 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE801B2CD9 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:03:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_24=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cLr-2DHT5hMU for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com (mail-ie0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 779111B2BF8 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iebmu5 with SMTP id mu5so41377948ieb.1 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+UYs4ngckHrMmXGbno7jEEBlLRuOiam+z58CA2uE/dg=; b=hnCssYcklZ3S/25tBorOAjY78hqOOXjXoFk2YDRarnnaUuXNpFR+fviIr2oXAwm+jR ZT5CWlBlOb8glSHbzsBGf8BnzFjkH3BMGhsHJuYElt7r6+KmZNrQ4ME+CPhQ4YChQk5k BzjeD92zIeSF4r4NpF4oIIT38kQn3G1VNRRenyl3zvF2ldeKe0smln5l8lA4U4oyX/WO VdSNLYLwP/0h2ox5PCUpvevOWu0sdAVpyARwZlnBuCtUQfw0H0SfQvWY+5xjmQE9gsr2 VAzxvToFWw7Ky/dY4aEEx4H898RPnYdkUHOGhe3AKg8uRqcU5aiItEhsT/etGhnGAMCn uB2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlJm9YaaafYK4m6LXO7578EiiFctW4pgga13B6RgT3uGC9Q7ZEpoRGZKHc7qQafQ+WlnXwo
X-Received: by 10.43.162.136 with SMTP id mk8mr2082213icc.28.1434571423863; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com (mail-ig0-f179.google.com. [209.85.213.179]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s5sm3834939igh.6.2015.06.17.13.03.42 for <mmusic@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:03:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igboe5 with SMTP id oe5so2060891igb.1 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.155.74 with SMTP id d71mr10500282ioe.29.1434571421749; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.89.70 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXpqJvrQwuE=7pngk=09wObc=qEw4u3yNs_dVMq3oSMhQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnXpqJvrQwuE=7pngk=09wObc=qEw4u3yNs_dVMq3oSMhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 16:03:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxsHGijygMQ5p9d_KYeuH++qFUP9-8hnbWVCyzpFqwN0ng@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140eadaffba970518bc2f82"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/J1030rUeWrFh0NLMyEyWCl4XOe0>
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Fixing draft-holmberg-mmusic-sdp-dtls-00
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 20:03:46 -0000

If you add that you also define an attribute to tell if remote party is
performing ICE restart or setting up new ICE connection then you got it
covered.

_____________
Roman Shpount

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Some of the statements here are backwards.  For example,
>
>    If an endpoint changes the local transport parameters associated with
>    a DTLS association, the endpoint MUST create a new DTLS association.
>
> I think that this document can be reduced to a series of conditionals:
>
> If you change the endpoint that is participating (because forking, or
> for any other reason), then you need a new DTLS association.
> Otherwise, how will that new endpoint know what keys to use.
>
> If you change the certificate you intend to use, then you need a new
> DTLS association.  Otherwise, you don't get to send the new
> certificate.
>
> If you change the DTLS roles, then you need a new DTLS association.
> Otherwise, it doesn't happen.
>
> If you request a new DTLS association, then you need a new transport.
> Otherwise, demux issues.
>
> An ICE restart is not sufficient a change to constitute a new
> transport.  You need entirely new IP+port pairs.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>