[MMUSIC] Request for SDP review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Fri, 03 June 2022 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225FFC14F740; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FClsW2zmlB60; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x92a.google.com (mail-ua1-x92a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19397C14F73D; Fri, 3 Jun 2022 10:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x92a.google.com with SMTP id 90so2717551uam.8; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 10:18:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dUOSADfDG2TKzgqzYuF6avCoynbAhwqWXMDPDta/EWU=; b=Vr3mF8nBo1NHblwRuZ7KQyEQfWjSSEQzH04Ztxv6EM6+XdN1hjdOPXAwCoyleZ7gxg +JJojSVyIp+Tj+DjiADss13fp+7oas9fX2lYbvi8Tw1w6fYGJvDoFEgQDnrWuJUae8VK /dnmh7sECoOUoB5yLh5fmq9NTxSaVcYRD7QztpACWh9LarF6+OnSuQiRVBUZ0X3yG3Fh K8oRYm5DDYicZMI5g9DTWbIeACGUb/lTAgAOVKa98+duwNMPFZL45dX2CGNpP6u1ExJB +z95In92fwWOQeHfzmbkOcxNLkEY2cNhkk7Z/FKp3H3kFZTyoHnw9+cb/H7qNYQk4Bl7 dRDg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dUOSADfDG2TKzgqzYuF6avCoynbAhwqWXMDPDta/EWU=; b=dKUYwmYbt3XT086dEjiSWHCFwv1+ltLsHto+LJ6joHUzFYXOZEUtwe2XWAx+m5A/tJ TIcDU/zpmgOrih8V50ktwbQqAeiBUOD8Vzj2vs5JYf40BPxpbDYGy9/TrMEzFblLI/zE FyJXBNAHqyZurs7BKMS6EbZwD1KsGccK0NUEj+thbUxCQ+VMG2NspKWAhq/rxeSkTaq1 q8MLT9tDvsHYRNRCGdjXtaS1cz4hjp4Tl8eBdZSjt2+9/XYEHya/fvwJ2ggm6zE0OIWF CXcaffwos4imCvtlB+fGhMRhvFsm2b6wn1p4lduXgwcndG0kF9/A9O/ER4r5tJ6WNc1r rqWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533kq6KBY3zUkWNFE+8Kr0K0Hq6e3jFtgf+l2S1dfCXyJQ+B9V9J r5gpoQ+SOeyKgzYWRy3OVMd6KFpjQD3L4/jK+gLhDixBkCk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzETETGMbRNmqBKTctSKG0prBRnaeLN0o66OrknmqM8st3Fa0MT1wrAFZddm1P45chk8hiFrSUAa7iPGbLaWEI=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:2008:0:b0:352:2b3a:6bce with SMTP id v8-20020ab02008000000b003522b3a6bcemr29040875uak.19.1654276689501; Fri, 03 Jun 2022 10:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 10:17:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOW+2dteHH82gXu0tBt7u6h=c-tqVpoEM5_Q0isdzzKAXe-TZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
Cc: IETF AVTCore WG <avt@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007021fe05e08e4e66"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/JrhLUX0qGAHvClAP7WjaJO4HIvo>
Subject: [MMUSIC] Request for SDP review of draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2022 17:18:12 -0000

The AVTCORE WG would like to solicit an SDP review of "RTP payload format
for the SCIP codec" (draft-ietf-avtcore-rpt-scip).  The document is
available for inspection here:
draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip-01 - RTP Payload Format for the SCIP Codec
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-avtcore-rtp-scip/>

When submitting a review, please CC the AVTCORE WG (avt@ietf.org).

As noted in the introduction, SCIP is a "pseudo-codec" that provides secure
session establishment and transport over RTP.  One of the goals of the
document is to improve interop between SCIP endpoints and intermediaries
such as SBCs and RTP relays.  For example, SBCs have been  observed to
reject SDP Offers including SCIP, and some RTP relays have attempted to
interpret or transcode SCIP RTP payloads, which is not helpful because they
are encrypted and integrity protected.

While SCIP is primarily used for secure audio communications, there is some
experience with video (H.264) as well. In conferencing use cases, SCIP
should be considered a "hop by hop" security service, in contrast to an
"end to end" service such as SFrame. That is, SCIP is compatible with audio
mixing or video MCU services, with the central conferencing server having
access to cleartext media, thereby being considered "trusted".

Note that the document has informative references to the following
documents which can be made available upon request:

         [SCIP210]   SCIP-210, "SCIP Signaling Plan", Revision 3.10, 26
                     October 2017, request access via email
                     <ncia.cis3@ncia.nato.int>.

         [SCIP214]   SCIP-214.2, "Secure Communication Interoperability
                     Protocol (SCIP) over Real-time Transport Protocol
                     (RTP)", Revision 1.1, 18 April 2014, request access
                     via email <ncia.cis3@ncia.nato.int>.


Bernard Aboba

For the AVTCORE WG Chairs