Re: [MMUSIC] Seriously, USE-CANDIDATE!!! in 5245bis

[Emil Ivov <[e-mail]>]

On 22.07.14, 11:02, Ari Keränen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7/21/14 4:45 PM, Emil Ivov wrote:
>> In London we mentioned the option of adding a new attribute that, during
>> aggressive nomination, the controlling agent can use to notify its peer
>> that ICE processing is over and no more changes are going to be
>> attempted. This way controlled agents will no they can now release
>> resources.
>>
>> This could either be a new attribute (e.g., USE-CANDIDATE-CONFIRMED) or,
>> as Justin suggested in an off-list discussion, we could have the
>> controlling agent send a second USE-CANDIDATE once aggressive nomination
>> converges.
>
> Did you consider using the updated offer to indicate that you're really
> done? This would require that you always send it (i.e., a slight
> modification to 5245), but that's something that has been already
> proposed to be updated for other purposes.

The point is to have all that information without involving signalling, 
as is the case with regular nomination.

Let me ask the question the other way. Is there any reason not to do this?

Emil


-- 
https://jitsi.org