Re: [MMUSIC] [rtcweb] Updating JSEP and BUNDLE

["Murray S. Kucherawy" <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:19 AM Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund=
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Let me clarify. My first issue was about the process up to this point that
> no
> one had taken the time to actually inform the participants on the MMUSIC WG
> mailing that one specification developed by the WG had an issue in
> relation to
> another one done in RTCWeb when in AUTH48. Independently of where that work
> shold be done to fix this, I think there exists a need to inform people
> about
> this plan. And when publishing that plan only to RTCWeb mailing list that
> got me
> annoyed.
>

This was my fault.  The decision had only just been made to reconstitute
RTCWEB to take up this one issue, rather than doing it in MMUSIC (though
thank you to the MMUSIC chairs for being willing).  After we worked on the
new charter, I sent that message to RTCWEB.  I had meant to also send it to
MMUSIC, but instead packed up for the weekend before I did so.  Apologies
for the oversight.

Secondly, I can definitely live with the work being done in a revivied
> specifically charted RTCWeb WG. However, SDP Offer/Answer is used in
> several
> places for different usages. Something which was considred very much when
> developing BUNDLE. Thus, I think it is relevant that RTCWeb will keep
> MMUSIC
> informed about their work. So that RTCWeb doesn't end up missing an
> important
> aspect of this, a run into issue when forming the IETF consensus needed to
> publish this document.
>

I think the revised charter takes this into account.  Please let me know if
it needs any other corrections.

-MSK