IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE Weekly Summary: Assumptions

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Mon, 13 May 2013 19:33 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA23421F93FC for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2013 12:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.816
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.816 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.433, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l46BMqFv+xzY for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2013 12:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C7921F8A7B for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2013 12:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f396d000007d06-4c-51914015a338
Received: from ESESSHC009.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id E4.D1.32006.51041915; Mon, 13 May 2013 21:33:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.167]) by ESESSHC009.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.45]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Mon, 13 May 2013 21:33:40 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE Weekly Summary: Assumptions
Thread-Index: AQHOUA+KJ03b0bLKtEyP+xBXZ/VYR5kDgNOQ
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 19:33:39 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36F64D@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36B485@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1134DEF4B@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <CABcZeBMrgaHGXFi_NRk+znsT-AGnRS5EDLgFhZgGA+VG81BhZw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnW=4zNgauXc-=pv9j9zGdVntmb=K22wcRr77wfQc-6J3w@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBODcyo-JXqs6EZ-F5BY_TaM94+eu+UqNApFnTNjpehUzA@mail.gmail.com> <518D73E4.4090609@alum.mit.edu> <9D12C4E8-F7C1-4D32-A8AC-570AC86ACA23@vidyo.com> <518D9361.7060301@alum.mit.edu> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36EC03@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36F1EB@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <5191033D.4040605@alum.mit.edu> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36F59E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <519134FF.5010405@alum.mit.edu> <789CDEFF-5266-4F0B-8EE3-65D879840616@vidyo.com>
In-Reply-To: <789CDEFF-5266-4F0B-8EE3-65D879840616@vidyo.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: fi-FI
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.146]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvra6ow8RAg1WTDCz2Lz7PbDF1+WMW ixUbDrA6MHv8ff+ByWPJkp9MHm3P7rAHMEdx2aSk5mSWpRbp2yVwZWw49Ye54AB7xaeepAbG j6xdjJwcEgImEh8OvWeCsMUkLtxbz9bFyMUhJHCYUWLBmweMEM4SRon/v7YCORwcbAIWEt3/ tEEaRAT8JF72f2MCCTMLqEtcXRwEYgoDVXzZVQtiighYSqy+7wVRbCSx//tcsE0sAqoSk58s ZAGxeQV8JRZd62WFWDSfTWLVjHcsIL2cArYS619qgdQwAl32/dQasF5mAXGJDwevM0NcLCCx ZM95KFtU4uXjf1BfKUn82HCJBaJeR2LB7k9sELa2xLKFr5kh9gpKnJz5hGUCo9gsJGNnIWmZ haRlFpKWBYwsqxjZcxMzc9LLjTYxAuPl4JbfqjsY75wTOcQozcGiJM6bzNUYKCSQnliSmp2a WpBaFF9UmpNafIiRiYNTqoExrPArF5N5t4RavJZ0geCuio6CvUprDpsY77utZ5ohJmWZ32xx +/7qA8KLrrrqsO4vzDT96L50X/5/q2h7u4ZNxX+9H9dfTpW12mzseOprsLKXqN7Hc6EnKm4W bql4p9r/WPB0347XOV9exGv79vOsTOn47sFfKuISci5vSYe8/sV/TeE3UpVYijMSDbWYi4oT AchCBE1lAgAA
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE Weekly Summary: Assumptions
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 19:33:49 -0000

Hi,

>> Surely the bundle draft must specify this.
>> 
>> My first thought is that the address/port of the *first* m-line in the 
>> bundle with a non-zero port will be used for the entire bundle.
>> 
>> (This means that when you initially offer a bundle with a bunch of 
>> separate ports, you not only must be prepared to use each of those for 
>> an unbundled m-line, you must be prepared to use any of them for the 
>> complete bundle.)
>
> An offerer sends an initial offer with a bundle of two m-lines: one with port 20000, one with 30000.
>
> The answerer answers, rejecting the first m-line (with port zero) but accepting the bundle.

Or, the answerer accepts the first m- line, but excludes it from the bundle. Maybe we need to re-think whether it should be allowed to exclude an m- line from a bundle in the answer...

> Should the answerer send traffic to port 20000 or port 30000?

Regards,

Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email