Re: [MMUSIC] [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Tue, 28 March 2017 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85FA512940E for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 08:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s6AcQIiy8tM6 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 08:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D2B6129686 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 08:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.108]) by resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id st11cWOh7l4eqst14cFR2e; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 15:26:38 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.110] ([24.62.227.142]) by resomta-ch2-12v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id st13c95LnqoNEst14cWvrD; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 15:26:38 +0000
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp.all@ietf.org>
References: <60b45113-8012-9a6c-2019-dea5b57ca7bb@alum.mit.edu> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CB31018@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se> <c546ae96-4d6e-6da6-a004-e12d6f1969fb@alum.mit.edu> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CB324DF@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, IETF MMUSIC WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <396d9a7d-892c-2731-5e56-e42836a43072@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:26:37 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4CB324DF@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfDEok2DvLbIGNqkekiXvZD48eBcDTFnaPX/yNl8FcviriDY1jz4lDvOWETVAwhHEh+UuIx8E/+nvvIoVmlhfHyiImLihz0L1H0LdCkrITDC6hJ7zaQkp nq/ANfRxO7gUthZzqESSUR25djgPXmcF9IsFhMs2BC2+6jPm8eH9VXzMJyFpy4q66Mut7oPkNPS7//qKIGWTaFRY3K0Poq+mVPx1Ly4+99w6k4WSs3RVo8vG uM3/+fX0GR8ULvIrd1V7E+Ceb2LgYAg9TzWkl0IF14dw+3HFwz/Zs86H1jRAZFDi
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/NF8mim8EmkfXutXyCtVN6eJyuBo>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-22
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 15:26:40 -0000

On 3/28/17 10:40 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ...
>
> (3) Minor:
>
>>>> I concur with the comments in the ops-dir review by Carlos Pignataro
>>>> regarding the formatting of section 9. He didn't suggest a fix.
>>>> Perhaps some special marker (e.g. "|" or "<" and ">") can be placed in every line to indicate it
>>>> is test from or for another document - either at the beginning or end of every line.
>>>
>>> I have never seen that been used before - not in documents I have authored, or in documents written by others.
>>
>> Yes, I know. I was just trying to be constructive by suggesting *something*. My first thought was to indent.
>>
>> But that would require reflowing all the text to avoid exceeding line length. That seemed like a bad idea.
>>
>> I'm not attached to this solution. I've complained about the same problem in other drafts, but nobody came
>> up with a solution so they didn't get resolved. Here I'm not the only one who sees a problem, so maybe it is
>> worth trying to find a solution.
>
> I don't have a problem to add e.g. "|", if that's what people want to do, but my preference would be to not do anything in this draft, at this point of time.

Since Carlos Pignataro also commented on this in a different review, it 
would be good to see what he thinks. (He isn't on *this* thread.)

Also, what do others in the WG think?

	Thanks,
	Paul