Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Accept m- line, reject bundle

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Fri, 10 May 2013 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBF021F8FDB for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2013 15:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.129
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.129 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.308, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xNc4r6b5EG6a for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2013 15:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1951621F902D for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2013 15:01:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.11]) by qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id aBcu1l0010EZKEL55N1lVS; Fri, 10 May 2013 22:01:45 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id aN1l1l00Y3ZTu2S3MN1l2E; Fri, 10 May 2013 22:01:45 +0000
Message-ID: <518D6E48.5060700@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 18:01:44 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36B4F6@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB1134DECEA@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <CABkgnnUAnV4PUQQBn_A-ic=4kkden4npSsJhGXtnCkGo+UodNg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUAnV4PUQQBn_A-ic=4kkden4npSsJhGXtnCkGo+UodNg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1368223305; bh=mL6Wcb+lgHRvty6v0Upv4upczCg2iZMZTFQgV68CDY8=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=d89EV60OLc4kQONcvMwzbmCrPMEL/uAi+nfDDHUECvLEGT7tskE2YGRwF5gRDYY6H zgOApUUbRiFKu8w9TL9c+SwqIBkqR1V0n14uju84gRZQ/Mfcu8nSGruVhzFkC3AouD r/+ZHoK3HG2R/xc9PhTPBdKCImC9dxhF2Wjx6MvjlCoa0teyoBGci5q10liDWAaTrP uCT1jg8iikQdgRl2NCbnl0/A0TXYQrLvWwLo9TgdpndSG2dhrot1zeEA+xa15jKmEl JT8B2IRYahRzfyLNbnByaBkUe9o1N3WxTOScPc35qSdsO9wtD+rj6AGNY/WYY0OwaD LJhRB2LzbfMTQ==
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Accept m- line, reject bundle
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 22:01:51 -0000

It sounds like we are approaching violent agreement on this.

But what about "bundle splitting" that I introduced even before this 
discussion began? It is more complex. Because of the rule that a bundle 
can't include an m-line with zero port, it is forced to use Alt-3.

IMO Alt 1-3 are all "valid", if the answerer finds them acceptable to 
it. But for certain common cases its pretty clear that one is clearly 
better than another.

Alt 1 is better in cases when you can use it. Alt 3 should work when Alt 
1 won't. I envision no cases when Alt 2 is useful, but I see no reason 
to ban it.

	Thanks,
	Paul

On 5/10/13 4:54 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 10 May 2013 13:47, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com> wrote:
>>> A few alternatives on how this could be achieved have been presented:
>>>
>>> Alt 1.      The answerer accepts the m- line, but does not associate it with a BUNDLE group.
>>>
>>> Alt 2.      The answerer accepts the m- line, associates it with a BUNDLE group, and then sends a new offer which removes the m- line from the BUNDLE group.
>>>
>>> Alt 3.      The answerer rejects the m- line, and then sends a new offer which adds the m- line outside a BUNDLE group.
>>
>> I think you want to to Alt 1.
>
> I'm on Alt 1 as well.  There are two signals that this is unbundled:
>    a. The port is different.
>    b. The BUNDLE group doesn't include the mid.
> The former wouldn't be sufficient, but the latter is always enough.
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>