Re: [MMUSIC] RID update (draft-pthatcher-mmusic-rid-01,> )

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Fri, 16 October 2015 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE431B2FBD for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 07:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Su9A7U2XVbiu for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 07:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 553731B2FF7 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 07:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.101]) by resqmta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id VquN1r0012Bo0NV01qwP95; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:56:23 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.151]) by resomta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id VqwN1r00Q3Ge9ey01qwNv6; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:56:23 +0000
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <56202075.3000202@nostrum.com> <5620692D.5030703@alum.mit.edu> <5620FA1D.2090203@nostrum.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <56211015.6010804@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:56:21 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5620FA1D.2090203@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1445007383; bh=7/ZH4kWjDI+W2PkaWb8L+t6caPTof10Fu+mWer4jRmI=; h=Received:Received:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=j3sV+CDXuMoURa0fsV51DiQDzvTQgSU7dSEF3n8tq63kivXXo/CY0roa/jRcnH/F6 E5MFbzgwjud2pr+KWfGK7EAPDjH0agONtxXtTltwJacXu36VyU6gZOIxJbsV/uP/Xd JAE58TZuxDSIoY/6Cbky7BCuFruRMw2jJmiEjFid8TuCwT67lg4pAicN2DqlQdrh7+ jKckpwWeEjp0T52Pr1Eb2gIxFzb1bBe0B635RKhlWNoVHkm1cl4ggpAWem1OZuW5+x je7Bd6GAiCGvLVJ4aIMRJELSQn3NqjR8KKzgVeASHBJWS/6FhvYA9KmNPV/qlhm3nz fLc6gubPruZpA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/PD17qecM0CgAYOlOnKauxLVd1qM>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] RID update (draft-pthatcher-mmusic-rid-01,> )
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:56:25 -0000

On 10/16/15 9:22 AM, Adam Roach wrote:
> I agree with Mo's responses in general, but there's one comment that I'm
> a little confused by:
>
> On 10/15/15 22:04, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>> * Section 10:
>>
>> As somebody noted, it is confusing to have ";" separate multiple PT
>> *values* within rid-fmt-list, and also to separate rid-params.
>
> In the -01 document
> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pthatcher-mmusic-rid-01#page-13),
> rid-fmt-list is defined as:
>
>     rid-fmt-list      = "pt=" fmt *( "," fmt )
>                          ; fmt defined in {{RFC4566 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4566>}}
>
>
> That is, the separator is a comma.
>
> Is there somewhere else in the syntax this is botched? I thought I
> caught all of these inconsistencies in the -01 revision.

Oops! My fault for not seeing that change that is right in front of me.

That solution works. It gives me a *slight* amount of heartburn because 
(due to SIP syntax) I'm wired to think that ";" binds tighter than ",". 
But I can get over it. (Or the roles of "," and ";" could be swapped. 
But I'm also wired to expect params to be separated by ";".)

	Thanks,
	Paul