IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] 4572 moving forward

Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com> Wed, 02 November 2016 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=51141ba447=jonathan@vidyo.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BD512963A for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 08:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=3.297, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lKR7pyCvYN6T for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 08:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00198e01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00198e01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F7EB129505 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 08:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0073110.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00198e01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id uA2FTJEm002461; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 11:30:10 -0400
Received: from mail.vidyo.com ([162.209.16.214]) by mx0b-00198e01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 26cph53utg-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 02 Nov 2016 11:30:10 -0400
Received: from 492132-EXCH1.vidyo.com ([fe80::50:56ff:fe85:4f77]) by 492133-EXCH2.vidyo.com ([fe80::50:56ff:fe85:6b62%13]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:30:09 -0500
From: Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] 4572 moving forward
Thread-Index: AQHSNRzequSXS2/Lrke+f8LK944NSaDGJZYA
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:30:09 +0000
Message-ID: <5706A91A-5C8F-4821-8137-994F53950430@vidyo.com>
References: <D7470941-FF03-44E4-A23B-BCD81060C822@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <D7470941-FF03-44E4-A23B-BCD81060C822@iii.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [160.79.219.114]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5706A91A5C8F48218137994F53950430vidyocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-11-02_03:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1609300000 definitions=main-1611020290
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/PQ-mFNBBKIEkabell8l3WjT87Sk>
Cc: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] 4572 moving forward
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:30:14 -0000

I’m happy to become a co-author on this (retroactively), but my affiliation should probably be updated from Columbia University. :-)

(I think I may have argued for a 4572bis previously, too.)

On Nov 1, 2016, at 7:52 PM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca<mailto:fluffy@iii.ca>> wrote:


So Martin and I talked today about how to move forward on this. We think that we have a proposal that meets everyones requirements (you will groan when you hear but just ask yourself if you can live with it vs is it your favorite because we think everyone could live with this)

We discussed two paths 1) split to two drafts, one with update for multiple fingerprints and separate extension that adds sha256. 2) just obsolete 4572 with new RFC. Martin prefers the obsolete path and I can live with that so that’s our proposal. To make this happen quickly, I converted 4572 to markdown and you can find it in the master branch at https://github.com/fluffy/4572bis and took the changes from Christer's draft and turned them in to a PR for bis draft. If you like to review on GitHub, you can check out PR at https://github.com/fluffy/4572bis/pull/1/files If you just want to see what the final draft would look like, it is attached to this email.


_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic@ietf.org<mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
<draft-jennings-4572bis-00.txt>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email