Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE: Splitting a BUNDLE

[Christer Holmberg <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

>>> We seem to have an agreement that, when an SDP offer contains an m- 
>>> line associated with a bundle group, it is ok to leave that m- line 
>>> outside the bundle group in the SDP Answer.
>>>
>> Now, there has been some discussions about b>
>> Yes, this is the conclusion I reached. I wish it weren't true. But I 
>> think there must be a mechanism for the new bundle to be rejected, and 
>> if it is first proposed in the answer then that isn't possible.
>> 
>> IMO this is a rare enough case that suffering another O/A is acceptable.
>
> I agree with Paul here.

Me too :)

> Allowing a new group (bundle) to be created in an answer is a much larger deviation from RFC 5888 than allowing an m= line with a zero port to be in a group, and the accept/reject problem can't be solved.

Note that there are two cases:

1) A new bundle is created in the answer

2) An m- line is moved from bundle_x in the offer to bundle_y in the answer. bundle_y was also present in the offer, so it is not created by the answerer.

In my opinion 2) should not be allowed either, as the m- line was not present in bundle_y in the offer.

Regards,

Christer