Re: [MMUSIC] Reference update from 4566 to 4566bis?

This appears to have crossed my message in the air.  I respectfully request
that you revert this request to the RFC editors, on the basis I gave in my
mail.  If you don't do that, I'm afraid I will, and we will have a mess.

Please also recall that time zones are a thing, and that some of the people
you wanted to review this just started their day a small amount of time
ago; generally speaking, less than a day's review for a suggested change to
this cluster is not reasonable.

regards,

Ted

On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 8:51 AM Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg=
40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> >Makes sense (as long as none of those references were explicitly to 4566
> rather than 4566bis).
>
> Sure.
>
> But, at least in the drafts listed below, I did not find anything that
> would have been 4566-specific, so I have asked the RFC editor to update the
> references.
>
> I don’t think we should publish RFCs with references to specifications
> that are obsoleted from day one…
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
>
> -- Flemming (as individual)
>
> On 5/5/20 4:34 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Some of the drafts in Cluster 238 that reference RFC 4566, while other
> reference draft-4566bis-
>
>
>
> Since draft-4566bis is also part of Cluster 238, and is in the RFC
> editor’s queue, should we update the references to draft-4566bis?
>
>
>
> The change would be done **at least** to the following drafts (I will
> only check the ones I author/co-author):
>
>
>
> MMUSIC WG:
>
>
>
> draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp
>
> draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation
>
> draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp
>
>
>
> BFCPbis:
>
>
>
> draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27
>
>
>
> One of the reason many drafts do not reference 4566bis is because the
> drafts were going to be finalized long before 4566bis. But, as that is now
> not the case….
>
>
>
> draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-attributes references both 4566 (normative) and
> 4566bis (informative). In my opinion we could make 4566bis normative there,
> but I’d like to hear what Suhas thinks.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Christer
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> mmusic mailing list
>
> mmusic@ietf.org
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>