Re: [MMUSIC] Questions about ICE candidates with BUNDLE

[Peter Thatcher <[e-mail]>]

Sure.

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:07 AM, Christer Holmberg <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Peter,
>
>
>
> I submitted a new version (-27) of BUNDLE a few days ago. Could you take a
> look at the ICE Considerations section, and say whether you are ok with the
> text?
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Christer
>
>
>
> *From:* Peter Thatcher [mailto:[e-mail]]
> *Sent:* 25 February 2016 08:53
> *To:* Christer Holmberg <[e-mail]>
> *Cc:* Roman Shpount <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; Paul Kyzivat <
> [e-mail]>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [MMUSIC] Questions about ICE candidates with BUNDLE
>
>
>
> That makes sense to me.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Christer Holmberg <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Hi Roman,
>
> I didn't check whether some of the ICE attributes were session-level, but
> I agree with what you say: the same rule should apply to all media-level
> ICE attributes.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ------------------------------
>
> *From: *Roman Shpount <[e-mail]>
> *Sent: *‎21/‎02/‎2016 08:21
> *To: *Christer Holmberg <[e-mail]>
> *Cc: *Peter Thatcher <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; Paul Kyzivat
> <[e-mail]>
> *Subject: *Re: [MMUSIC] Questions about ICE candidates with BUNDLE
>
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Christer Holmberg <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
> >> Correct, and that's one reason I suggest that we limit the scope to
> ICE, eventhough we probably
> >> could do the same thing for any IDENTICAL and TRANSPORT category
> attribute.
> >
> ​> While it would be nice to remove any duplication, the duplication is
> particularly painful for ICE candidates, because
> > there can be a lot of them, and because they change without any
> offer/answer action (thanks to trickle ICE). ​
> > So if we just covered that candidates, we'd be getting most of the value.
>
> Assuming the scope is ICE, shouldn't the same still apply also to other
> ICE related attributes? I assume the values for the "remote-candidates",
> "ice-lite", "ice-mismatch", "ice-ufrag", "ice-pwd", "ice-pacing" and
> "ice-options" attributes will be identical within a BUNDLE group, so...
>
>
>
> "ice-lite" and "ice-options" are session level only candidates, so they
> should not be in the m= line BUNDLE or any other type. The same logic that
> applies to ICe candidates should apply to other media level ICE SDP
> attributes or things will break
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> _____________
> Roman Shpount
>
>
>
>
>