Re: [MMUSIC] [dispatch] SDP negotiation of data channel sub-protocols

Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com> Thu, 07 November 2013 18:34 UTC

Return-Path: <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0CC11E81DA for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:34:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jmJpwDuTb2De for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:34:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2B621E8140 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 10:34:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id rA7IXuYH013821 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:33:57 GMT
Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA7IXtIK011744 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:33:56 GMT
Received: from abhmt110.oracle.com (abhmt110.oracle.com [141.146.116.62]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA7IXtEo011735; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:33:55 GMT
Received: from dhcp-a434.meeting.ietf.org (/31.133.164.52) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 10:33:55 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <527B35BE.2070004@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 13:33:54 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <72B28FB4-EB19-4289-9F72-D8C5745D9E89@oracle.com>
References: <03FBA798AC24E3498B74F47FD082A92F3D87235B@US70UWXCHMBA04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <527B28D1.9090006@alum.mit.edu> <527B35BE.2070004@alvestrand.no>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]
Cc: mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] [dispatch] SDP negotiation of data channel sub-protocols
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:34:10 -0000

On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:39 AM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:

> For normal (as I think of it) WebRTC usage, we want one m-line to
> describe the SCTP association, and the channels are completely invisible.

Sure for WebRTC, of course that's true - because they're all one media type: application.  Only the application above (the one in JS) knows what's in the specific SCTP channels, right?  My comment at the mic about this was for non-WebRTC cases, such as if we were to standardize MSRP, BFCP, fax, etc. on SCTP. (or at least that's what I thought Richard's proposal was for, but I could be misunderstanding it)

-hadriel