IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] ICE aggressive nomination problem

Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org> Sun, 03 November 2013 23:34 UTC

Return-Path: <emcho@sip-communicator.org>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C0721E80A1 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 15:34:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.608
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.608 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.069, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sxlk77kDl8e3 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 15:34:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com (mail-pa0-f48.google.com [209.85.220.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB66F11E8252 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 15:34:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id kq14so6171994pab.7 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 15:34:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rOHa2dxVq3MJcqkzcgrZnMS45SnUeuzgLJ4ur6Y617c=; b=JWoja0lzOatn2RLlT/YSKbG8lTAAlx2TVuaWsGLakuGGdA8QMfJhE5NHSH0S7e9hNE CKmE7PO6gu7ycOQjLGXszJBUQrbzob8X10857JnGLi0E2wyiU88APhG6K1kymR5trB+K esbx/eUNG/o6lWBR08GG5DBOYoYT8ytHABjmQIculObgGIT0ynbosEKV3452RsjpHF1m 7ZKgw5C49BMZwD9C0+Q11ZBHlFA9fsah0yKvIOKZoV4viLQ5+tV5iRnxpGojqRTGdgSl 9jGAgciQ+XchI5TEe+z/4mCNKdoc0Q9FFp9ajlyEFOUS9JRsbLgggBK8YBOp/JR8zyyY At2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmzCQwo56xiDD6gVS1VNN2zYIVJUmw3YyIkPYtVczctai35Q3mxU2UBvFWwBmTolYHtFSrU
X-Received: by 10.66.52.19 with SMTP id p19mr3851822pao.123.1383521652335; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 15:34:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-x232.google.com (mail-pb0-x232.google.com [2607:f8b0:400e:c01::232]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o1sm24311377pbe.37.2013.11.03.15.34.11 for <mmusic@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Nov 2013 15:34:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f50.google.com with SMTP id uo5so6467080pbc.9 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 15:34:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.66.142.107 with SMTP id rv11mr15119944pab.17.1383521651806; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 15:34:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.191.163 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 15:33:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5276DC00.9030007@ericsson.com>
References: <50D1FE75.9060709@nomadiclab.com> <CABkgnnWpPQsOKP-Yy-dytaTzENg8Q8UOsoAoEQMN0Qo4JSUrOw@mail.gmail.com> <5276DAFA.2000301@ericsson.com> <CABkgnnU2Lk-S2Om+0Qv0LDvbp97fq8HknPq71Fq+Qkg4FxU9dg@mail.gmail.com> <5276DC00.9030007@ericsson.com>
From: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 00:33:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPvvaa+zskjZQHSpnm+JMGC3w=ri=LiSG5E6yG2=Ay6aJPm5Jg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] ICE aggressive nomination problem
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 23:34:17 -0000

Unless you maintain them, your candidates will timeout even with regular ICE.

If you do maintain them then you have data.

Or am I missing something?

Emil


On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com> wrote:
> On 11/3/13 3:25 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
>>
>> On 3 November 2013 15:23, Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Good point. How about if there's no application data to send before the
>>> NAT
>>> bindings time out?
>>
>>
>> Why did you want to use ICE then? :)
>
>
> Preemptive ICE in order to minimize setup delay? A corner-case of a
> corner-case? :)
>
>
> Cheers,
> Ari
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email