Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE TEXT: Offerer procedures (June 6th)

[Paul Kyzivat <[e-mail]>]

On 6/10/13 8:47 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> A comment on some of the stuff you sent earlier.
>
>> ISTM that all bundle offers must meet some constraints:
>> - some of the m-lines may have *unique* addresses
>> - all the rest, if any, must have a single *common* address.
>> - if any share a common address, then the first mid in the
>      bundle group must identify one of them
>
> What is the reason for the third bullet?
>
> For example, assume I am adding a new "m=" line, with a unique address, and I would like that address to become the new bundle address.
>
> In the existing "m=" lines, I couldn't keep the previously negotiated bundle address, because based on the third bullet the first mid would have to identity one of those. So, I would have to either:
>
> 1) Assign a unique address to each of the existing "m=" lines, which would then allow me to request the address of the new "m=" line to become the new bundle address; or
>
> 2) I would have to assign the suggested new bundle address to ALL "m=" lines (the existing ones and the new one).
>
> Note that both 1) and 2) are allowed today.

OK, I didn't think of that case.
So I guess that constraint should be removed.

	Thanks,
	Paul