Re: [MMUSIC] ICE aggressive nomination problem

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Sun, 03 November 2013 23:18 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3405921E8107 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 15:18:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yRK7+07Gj9fq for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 15:18:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FF611E8243 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 15:18:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id cb5so1270571wib.4 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 15:18:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=tIbRQ4BtkYGfr6GLNUHT/EwoAvPgOEFVg6bd7mwa+us=; b=RagLLjlcjfIH3sWjn7T02aE/ruK3rk94VThk9PArMtMJ5AU+yJrViEJn01g0/XAl04 Mxj971UZP42JZc4OEIxO7KUP5w/lI+zUuqfP18QAHU3BLIHSVXuLtCha7bp9tFv0LQ7b AqR1Y6HUNvYTgT0E1DO0DzU48qncnpGWTJADx+mfRMMDzUgJ1i7PUuYxaYy81kJdqe4o PUDMDJAHVabZortvZ2Le3WNkaQ7KrTi1D6ix8MAuyatfWUE5qaAjyesTT+9iTv5kEtZl DzE3RZYufpZxZUMdH9iQPRf/p/zJV/yszjBT8l3wcThNu45KLZ429woUxodzphqbCNTz 7Oig==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.181.13.204 with SMTP id fa12mr9936636wid.22.1383520711586; Sun, 03 Nov 2013 15:18:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.202.194 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 15:18:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50D1FE75.9060709@nomadiclab.com>
References: <50D1FE75.9060709@nomadiclab.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 15:18:31 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWpPQsOKP-Yy-dytaTzENg8Q8UOsoAoEQMN0Qo4JSUrOw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Ari Keranen <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] ICE aggressive nomination problem
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 23:18:33 -0000

On 19 December 2012 09:50, Ari Keranen <ari.keranen@nomadiclab.com> wrote:
> Any good ideas how to fix this? Should the controlling agent just keep
> retransmitting even after successful nomination (for how long)?

This specific problem came up when we were writing the CU-RTC-Web
demo.  It turns out that you can tell if a nomination is genuine by
the fact that application data arrives.  In this case, R notices that
path 2 is both nominated AND live, then it switches to that path.