Re: [MMUSIC] SCTP question: Where does it multiplex?

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Mon, 03 December 2012 07:53 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F5E21F86FD for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 23:53:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id At9-HzXySeWA for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 23:53:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED4D21F857E for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 23:53:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10BEC39E0FD for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08:53:38 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o7BEQhBAVJT2 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08:53:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.1.107] (unknown [188.113.88.47]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7001839E04C for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08:53:37 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <50BC5A81.6050503@alvestrand.no>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:53:37 +0100
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <5093A2C9.9040001@alvestrand.no> <50B9E3ED.6010604@ericsson.com> <50BA19F9.4040701@alvestrand.no> <50BA47E8.4010909@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <50BA47E8.4010909@alum.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] SCTP question: Where does it multiplex?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 07:53:41 -0000

On 12/01/2012 07:09 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> I must say that I am getting confused about what is being multiplexed 
> here. We must be very careful to be precise.
>
> SCTP defines an *association*, which in simple cases is bound to a 
> 5-tuple. (For now lets not talk about the cases where each end can 
> have more than one address.)
>
> SCTP multiplexes multiple one-way *streams* over an association. 
> (These are not RTP streams.)
>
> RTCWEB binds pairs of sctp-streams together into *channels*.

I'm not talking about any of these levels. I'm talking about the reuse 
of the RTP session's 5-tuple for the DTLS/SRTP 5-tuple, as described in 
RFC 5764 section 5.1.2.

I said the same thing earlier on this thread (Nov 5), when you first 
responded (thanks for being the first responder!)

You do make the point that the term "multiplex" is so over-used, it 
should probably be abandoned altogether - but that section talks about 
(de)multiplexing, so changing terminology is probably too late for that 
particular usage.

               Harald